273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31750801)
21. Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.
Rullman I; Patyna M; Janssen B; Willershausen B
Am J Dent; 2017 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29178709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of internal porosities for different placement techniques of bulk-fill resin-based composites: a micro-computed tomography study.
Al-Zain AO; Baeesa L; Jassoma E; Alghilan MA; Hariri M; Ismail EH; Münchow EA
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7489-7499. PubMed ID: 37971540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Internal Adaptation in Class II Bulk-fill Composite Restorations Using Micro-CT.
Han SH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 27892836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In-vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth restored with different high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative materials and bulk-fill composite resins.
Nezir M; Ozcan S
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):345. PubMed ID: 38809289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Jung JH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Strength of Bulk- vs Incrementally-filled Restorations.
de Assis FS; Lima SN; Tonetto MR; Bhandi SH; Pinto SC; Malaquias P; Loguercio AD; Bandéca MC
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 27419244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of composite type and placement technique on cuspal strain.
Ólafsson VG; Ritter AV; Swift EJ; Boushell LW; Ko CC; Jackson GR; Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 29034597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites.
Rizzante FAP; Mondelli RFL; Furuse AY; Borges AFS; Mendonça G; Ishikiriama SK
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jan; 27():e20180132. PubMed ID: 30624465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations.
Lins RBE; Aristilde S; Osório JH; Cordeiro CMB; Yanikian CRF; Bicalho AA; Stape THS; Soares CJ; Martins LRM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Oct; 98():255-261. PubMed ID: 31280052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
Guney T; Yazici AR
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites.
Furness A; Tadros MY; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24480086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite.
Atalay C; Yazici AR; Horuztepe A; Nagas E; Ertan A; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(5):E131-E140. PubMed ID: 27352045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of different polymerization times on color change, translucency parameter, and surface hardness of bulk-fill resin composites.
Gonder HY; Fidan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Oct; 25(10):1751-1757. PubMed ID: 36308250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations.
Berti LS; Turssi CP; Amaral FL; Basting RT; Junqueira JLC; Panzarella FK; Reis AF; França FM
Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):213-217. PubMed ID: 32794397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of Radiant Exposure on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of 10 Flowable and High-viscosity Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
de Deus RA; Oliveira L; Braga S; Ribeiro M; Price RB; Núñez A; Loguercio AD; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2024 Mar; 49(2):136-156. PubMed ID: 38349819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of Composite Polymerization Stress and Placement Technique on Dentin Micropermeability of Class I Restorations.
Fronza BM; Abuna GF; Braga RR; Rueggeberg FA; Giannini M
J Adhes Dent; 2018; 20(4):355-363. PubMed ID: 30206578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical Time Required and Internal Adaptation in Cavities restored with Bulk-fill Composites.
Vianna-de-Pinho MG; Rego GF; Vidal ML; Alonso RCB; Schneider LFJ; Cavalcante LM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 29208783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
