206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31751786)
1. Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock: The NICOM Study.
Rali AS; Buechler T; Van Gotten B; Waters A; Shah Z; Haglund N; Sauer A
J Card Fail; 2020 Feb; 26(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 31751786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulmonary arterial thermodilution, femoral arterial thermodilution and bioreactance cardiac output monitoring in a pediatric hemorrhagic hypovolemic shock model.
Ballestero Y; Urbano J; López-Herce J; Solana MJ; Botrán M; Vinciguerra D; Bellón JM
Resuscitation; 2012 Jan; 83(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 21763249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive cardiac output measurements in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Rich JD; Archer SL; Rich S
Eur Respir J; 2013 Jul; 42(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 23100501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter.
Lamia B; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28188408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy assessment of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in the hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
Zhu G; Zhang K; Fu Y; Hu Z
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Sep; 9(5):3506-3512. PubMed ID: 33065801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor in children undergoing cardiac surgery.
Lee JH; No HJ; Song IK; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim JT
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jul; 115(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25926311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective Evaluation of a Multibeat Analysis Cardiac Index Estimation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.
Kee A; Kirchhoff B; Grigsby J; Proch K; Ji Y; Agashe H; Flynn BC
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2023 Aug; 37(8):1377-1381. PubMed ID: 37121841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioreactance-based technique in pediatric patients with or without ventricular septal defect during anesthesia: in comparison with echocardiography.
Sun Y; Wu C; Wu JZ; Wang SS; Bai J; Zhu M; Zhang YQ; Zhang MZ
Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Feb; 25(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 25039420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique.
Raval NY; Squara P; Cleman M; Yalamanchili K; Winklmaier M; Burkhoff D
J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Apr; 22(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 18340540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation.
Squara P; Denjean D; Estagnasie P; Brusset A; Dib JC; Dubois C
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 17458538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of cardiac output measured by non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) and thermodilution in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Cheung H; Dong Q; Dong R; Yu B
J Anesth; 2015 Jun; 29(3):416-420. PubMed ID: 25381090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of maternal characteristics and gestational age on hemodynamic indices: NICOM device-specific reference ranges.
Perry H; Stirrup O; Gutierrez J; Vinayagam D; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):670-675. PubMed ID: 30548496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults.
Zhang J; Critchley LA; Lee DC; Khaw KS; Lee SW
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 26873749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bioreactance and echocardiographic non-invasive cardiac output monitoring and myocardial function assessment in primagravida women.
Doherty A; El-Khuffash A; Monteith C; McSweeney L; Breatnach C; Kent E; Tully E; Malone F; Thornton P
Br J Anaesth; 2017 Apr; 118(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 28403411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor in maternal cardiac disease: comparison of NICOM and transthoracic echocardiogram.
Florio KL; Williams EM; White D; Daming T; Hostetter S; Schrufer-Poland T; Gray R; Schmidt L; Grodzinsky A; Lee J; Rader V; Swearingen K; Nelson L; Patel N; Magalski A; Gosch K; Jones P; Fu Z; Spertus JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Mar; 6(3):101312. PubMed ID: 38342307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioreactance Is Not Interchangeable with Thermodilution for Measuring Cardiac Output during Adult Liver Transplantation.
Han S; Lee JH; Kim G; Ko JS; Choi SJ; Kwon JH; Heo BY; Gwak MS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127981. PubMed ID: 26017364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study.
Conway DH; Hussain OA; Gall I
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Aug; 30(8):501-8. PubMed ID: 23549128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between continuous non-invasive estimated cardiac output by pulse wave transit time and thermodilution method.
Sinha AC; Singh PM; Grewal N; Aman M; Dubowitz G
Ann Card Anaesth; 2014; 17(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 25281622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
