These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Kupersztych-Hagege E; Teboul JL; Artigas A; Talbot A; Sabatier C; Richard C; Monnet X Br J Anaesth; 2013 Dec; 111(6):961-6. PubMed ID: 23985531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of cardiac output studies from the Mostcare compared to a pulmonary artery catheter in septic patients. Gopal S; Do T; Pooni JS; Martinelli G Minerva Anestesiol; 2014 Mar; 80(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 24398442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of Goal-Directed Therapy Using Bioreactance Cardiac Output Monitoring after Valvular Heart Surgery. Lee S; Lee SH; Chang BC; Shim JK Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jul; 56(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 26069111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cardiac output measurements using the bioreactance technique in critically ill patients. Fagnoul D; Vincent JL; Backer de D Crit Care; 2012 Nov; 16(6):460. PubMed ID: 23158055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of a new semi-continuous cardiac output system in the intensive care unit. Seguin P; Colcanap O; Le Rouzo A; Tanguy M; Guillou YM; Mallédant Y Can J Anaesth; 1998 Jun; 45(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9669016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in neonates using bioreactance: a comparison with echocardiography. Weisz DE; Jain A; McNamara PJ; EL-Khuffash A Neonatology; 2012; 102(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 22508150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method. Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Alters the Calibration of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Readings, the NICOM, When Comparisons Are Made Against Suprasternal and Esophageal Doppler Intraoperatively. Huang L; Critchley LAH; Zhang J Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):936-945. PubMed ID: 26218863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is the placement of a pulmonary artery catheter still justified solely for the measurement of cardiac output? Sakka SG; Reinhart K; Wegscheider K; Meier-Hellmann A J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2000 Apr; 14(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 10794326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output. Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cardiac output measurements during high-risk Cesarean section using electrical bioreactance or arterial waveform analysis: assessment of agreement. Gutierrez J; Perry H; Columb M; Bampoe S; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 54(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 30302868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Non-invasive Doppler-derived cardiac output: a validation study comparing this technique with thermodilution and Fick methods. Davies JN; Allen DR; Chant AD Eur J Vasc Surg; 1991 Oct; 5(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 1959678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]