178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31753604)
21. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results with final histopathology in patients with proven prostate cancer in MRI/ultrasonography-fusion biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth M
BJU Int; 2016 Aug; 118(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26935133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations.
Wu S; Jiang Y; Liang Z; Chen S; Sun G; Ma S; Chen K; Liu R
Cancer Med; 2023 Sep; 12(17):17776-17787. PubMed ID: 37537798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The oncologic risk of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic cores in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
Gaffney CD; Tin AL; Fainberg J; Fine S; Jibara G; Touijer K; Eastham J; Scardino P; Laudone V; Vickers AJ; Ehdaie B
Cancer; 2023 Dec; 129(23):3790-3796. PubMed ID: 37584213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Focal Therapy Among Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed via Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted and Systematic Biopsies: A European Multicenter Study.
Mjaess G; Peltier A; Roche JB; Lievore E; Lacetera V; Chiacchio G; Beatrici V; Mastroianni R; Simone G; Windisch O; Benamran D; Fourcade A; Nguyen TA; Fournier G; Fiard G; Ploussard G; Roumeguère T; Albisinni S; Diamand R
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Nov; 9(6):992-999. PubMed ID: 37147167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can Extraprostatic Extension Be Predicted by Tumor-Capsule Contact Length in Prostate Cancer? Relationship With International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.
Bakir B; Onay A; Vural M; Armutlu A; Yıldız SÖ; Esen T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):588-596. PubMed ID: 31670596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.
van der Slot MA; Seyrek N; Kweldam CF; den Bakker MA; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; van Leenders GJLH
World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2723-2729. PubMed ID: 36190529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology-Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help?
Calio BP; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Maruf M; Jain AL; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):976-982. PubMed ID: 29154904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of criteria used to predict extraprostatic cancer extension: a tool for use in selecting patients for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Kamat AM; Jacobsohn KM; Troncoso P; Shen Y; Wen S; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1262-5. PubMed ID: 16145389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combination MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy may overestimate gleason grade on final surgical pathology and impact risk stratification.
Yu A; Yamany T; Mojtahed A; Hanna N; Nicaise E; Harisinghani M; Wu CL; Dahl DM; Wszolek M; Blute ML; Feldman AS
Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):59.e1-59.e5. PubMed ID: 34544650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Preoperative Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Histopathologic Analysis: A Comparison Between In-Bore MRI-guided and MRI-Transrectal US Fusion Prostate Biopsies.
Costa DN; Cai Q; Xi Y; Recchimuzzi DZ; Subramanian N; Bagrodia A; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Shah RB; Goldberg K; Diaz de Leon A; Pedrosa I
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 Mar; 3(2):e200123. PubMed ID: 33817652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Less qualitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer can underestimate extraprostatic extension in higher grade tumors.
Schmit S; Allu S; Tanzer JR; Ortiz R; Pareek G; Hyams E
Int Braz J Urol; 2024; 50(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 38166221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Downgrading of Grade Group After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Fusion Biopsy and Standard 12-Core Biopsy.
Beksac AT; Sobotka S; Xu P; Gupta A; Treacy PJ; Weil R; Mahajan K; Prasad S; Cumarasamy S; Martini A; Falagario U; Rastinehad A; Tewari AK
Urology; 2019 May; 127():80-85. PubMed ID: 30759371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer Is More Frequently Detected by Multiparametric MRI Targeted Biopsy Compared With Standard Biopsy.
Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Rais-Bahrami S
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Apr; 40(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 26523543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do contemporary imaging and biopsy techniques reliably identify unilateral prostate cancer? Implications for hemiablation patient selection.
Johnson DC; Yang JJ; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Mirak SA; Pooli A; Sadun T; Jayadevan R; Zhou S; Priester AM; Natarajan S; Bajgiran AM; Shakeri S; Sisk A; Felker ER; Raman SS; Marks LS; Reiter RE
Cancer; 2019 Sep; 125(17):2955-2964. PubMed ID: 31042322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incidence and Predicting Factors of Histopathological Features at Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the mpMRI Era: Results of a Single Tertiary Referral Center.
Di Mauro E; Di Bello F; Califano G; Morra S; Creta M; Celentano G; Abate M; Fraia A; Pezone G; Marino C; Cilio S; Capece M; La Rocca R; Imbimbo C; Longo N; Colla' Ruvolo C
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Mar; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension and Prostatectomy Outcome in Patients with Low-, Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Try to Find a Standard.
Radtke JP; Hadaschik BA; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Schwab C; Alt C; Roth W; Duensing S; Pahernik SA; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Teber D
J Endourol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1396-405. PubMed ID: 26154571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Velez E; Fedorov A; Tuncali K; Olubiyi O; Allard CB; Kibel AS; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2154-2159. PubMed ID: 28293720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
