These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31754708)

  • 1. TFregulomeR reveals transcription factors' context-specific features and functions.
    Lin QXX; Thieffry D; Jha S; Benoukraf T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jan; 48(2):e10. PubMed ID: 31754708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heterogeneity of transcription factor binding specificity models within and across cell lines.
    Sharmin M; Bravo HC; Hannenhalli S
    Genome Res; 2016 Aug; 26(8):1110-23. PubMed ID: 27311443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes.
    Afek A; Cohen H; Barber-Zucker S; Gordân R; Lukatsky DB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004429. PubMed ID: 26285121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational identification of diverse mechanisms underlying transcription factor-DNA occupancy.
    Cheng Q; Kazemian M; Pham H; Blatti C; Celniker SE; Wolfe SA; Brodsky MH; Sinha S
    PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(8):e1003571. PubMed ID: 23935523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MethMotif: an integrative cell specific database of transcription factor binding motifs coupled with DNA methylation profiles.
    Xuan Lin QX; Sian S; An O; Thieffry D; Jha S; Benoukraf T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(D1):D145-D154. PubMed ID: 30380113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DeepTFactor: A deep learning-based tool for the prediction of transcription factors.
    Kim GB; Gao Y; Palsson BO; Lee SY
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(2):. PubMed ID: 33372147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features.
    Kumar S; Bucher P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4. PubMed ID: 26818008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UniBind: maps of high-confidence direct TF-DNA interactions across nine species.
    Puig RR; Boddie P; Khan A; Castro-Mondragon JA; Mathelier A
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):482. PubMed ID: 34174819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial distribution of predicted transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila ChIP peaks.
    Pettie KP; Dresch JM; Drewell RA
    Mech Dev; 2016 Aug; 141():51-61. PubMed ID: 27264535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of topic models to a compendium of ChIP-Seq datasets uncovers recurrent transcriptional regulatory modules.
    Yang G; Ma A; Qin ZS; Chen L
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2352-2358. PubMed ID: 31899481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of Human Lineage-Specific Transcriptional Coregulators Enabled by a Glossary of Binding Modules and Tunable Genomic Backgrounds.
    Mariani L; Weinand K; Vedenko A; Barrera LA; Bulyk ML
    Cell Syst; 2017 Sep; 5(3):187-201.e7. PubMed ID: 28957653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PlantPAN3.0: a new and updated resource for reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks from ChIP-seq experiments in plants.
    Chow CN; Lee TY; Hung YC; Li GZ; Tseng KC; Liu YH; Kuo PL; Zheng HQ; Chang WC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(D1):D1155-D1163. PubMed ID: 30395277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MotifGenie: a Python application for searching transcription factor binding sequences using ChIP-Seq datasets.
    Oguztuzun C; Yasar P; Yavuz K; Muyan M; Can T
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Nov; 37(22):4238-4239. PubMed ID: 33999190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcription factor-DNA binding: beyond binding site motifs.
    Inukai S; Kock KH; Bulyk ML
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2017 Apr; 43():110-119. PubMed ID: 28359978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.