These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31755009)

  • 41. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Older Adults and Their Families' Online Reviews of Urban Nursing Homes in China.
    Yuan H; Shen X; Kong G; Duan C
    Gerontologist; 2024 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 37773927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A cross-sectional analysis of Yelp and Google reviews of hospitals in the United States.
    Zitek T; Bui J; Day C; Ecoff S; Patel B
    J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open; 2023 Apr; 4(2):e12913. PubMed ID: 36852191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.
    Bovenzi CD; Manges KA; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 32716653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patient-Centered Insights and Biases Regarding Cardiologists Via Online Review Platform Analysis.
    Mark E; Oswald M; Kundar P; Gulati M
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Feb; 12(3):e027405. PubMed ID: 36718881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Socioeconomic and Geographic Disparities in Accessing Nursing Homes With High Star Ratings.
    Yuan Y; Louis C; Cabral H; Schneider JC; Ryan CM; Kazis LE
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2018 Oct; 19(10):852-859.e2. PubMed ID: 29983361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patient Satisfaction Is Associated With Dialysis Facility Quality and Star Ratings.
    Kshirsagar AV; Tabriz AA; Bang H; Lee SD
    Am J Med Qual; 2019; 34(3):243-250. PubMed ID: 30223675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Analysis of Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Practices Using Natural Language Processing.
    Langerhuizen DWG; Brown LE; Doornberg JN; Ring D; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Janssen SJ
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 29(8):337-344. PubMed ID: 32796371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptions of Hearing Health Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Satisfied and Dissatisfied Online Reviews.
    van Bruggen S; Bennett RJ; Manchaiah V; Jager LB; Swanepoel W
    Am J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 33(2):386-410. PubMed ID: 38483218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Getting to the Bottom of Patient Experiences with Genital Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Online Reviews.
    Moog D; Latack KR; Adidharma W; Haley C; Satterwhite T; Morrison SD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2990-2995. PubMed ID: 33543343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessment of Consumer Complaint Investigation Scores, Recertification Survey Scores, and Overall Nursing Home Health Inspection Star Quality Rating.
    Peterson LJ; Bowblis JR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Feb; 6(2):e2253952. PubMed ID: 36749590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Five-Star Skilled Nursing Facility Rating System and Care of Disadvantaged Populations.
    Zuckerman RB; Wu S; Chen LM; Joynt Maddox KE; Sheingold SH; Epstein AM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2019 Jan; 67(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 30339726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
    Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.
    Hao H; Zhang K; Wang W; Gao G
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():37-44. PubMed ID: 28118920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are Facebook user ratings associated with hospital cost, quality and patient satisfaction? A cross-sectional analysis of hospitals in New York State.
    Campbell L; Li Y
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Feb; 27(2):119-129. PubMed ID: 28600452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluating national trends in outcomes after implementation of a star rating system: Results from dialysis facility compare.
    Salerno S; Dahlerus C; Messana J; Wisniewski K; Tong L; Hirth RA; Affholter J; Gremel G; Wu Y; Zhu J; Roach J; Balovlenkov Rn E; Andress J; Li Y
    Health Serv Res; 2021 Feb; 56(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 33184854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Correlation between social media utilization by academic neurosurgery departments and higher online patient ratings.
    Lamano JB; Riestenberg RA; Haskell-Mendoza AP; Lee D; Sharp MT; Bloch O
    J Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 136(6):1760-1772. PubMed ID: 34678765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.