These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31756205)

  • 21. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling spatial disease rates using maximum likelihood.
    Leroux BG
    Stat Med; 2000 Sep 15-30; 19(17-18):2321-32. PubMed ID: 10960856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bring More Data!-A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size.
    Šinkovec H; Geroldinger A; Heinze G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31766753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fixed or random testlet effects: a comparison of two multilevel testlet models.
    Chen TA
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 23234827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Performance of Multivariate Methods for Two-Group Comparisons with Small Samples and Incomplete Data.
    Pituch KA; Joshi M; Cain ME; Whittaker TA; Chang W; Park R; McDougall GJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):704-721. PubMed ID: 31552754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data.
    Pan H; Liu S; Miao D; Yuan Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 29580203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Computationally More Efficient and More Accurate Stepwise Approach for Correcting for Sampling Error and Measurement Error.
    Zitzmann S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):612-632. PubMed ID: 29781710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Carlin JB; Forbes AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 35418034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study.
    Siino M; Fasola S; Muggeo VM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1365-1375. PubMed ID: 27510370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Generalized sample size determination formulas for experimental research with hierarchical data.
    Usami S
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):346-56. PubMed ID: 24197710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Small Sample Methods for Multilevel Modeling: A Colloquial Elucidation of REML and the Kenward-Roger Correction.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):661-670. PubMed ID: 28715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Generalized linear mixed models for binary data: are matching results from penalized quasi-likelihood and numerical integration less biased?
    Benedetti A; Platt R; Atherton J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84601. PubMed ID: 24416249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sample size planning for longitudinal models: accuracy in parameter estimation for polynomial change parameters.
    Kelley K; Rausch JR
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 21744968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multilevel Factor Analysis: Reporting Guidelines and a Review of Reporting Practices.
    Kim ES; Dedrick RF; Cao C; Ferron JM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):881-898. PubMed ID: 27754708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: power, sample size, and resource considerations.
    Dziak JJ; Nahum-Shani I; Collins LM
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):153-75. PubMed ID: 22309956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating multilevel logistic regression models when the number of clusters is low: a comparison of different statistical software procedures.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2010 Apr; 6(1):Article 16. PubMed ID: 20949128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sample size and power calculations based on generalized linear mixed models with correlated binary outcomes.
    Dang Q; Mazumdar S; Houck PR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Aug; 91(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 18462826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.
    Moineddin R; Matheson FI; Glazier RH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():34. PubMed ID: 17634107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.