211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31757845)
1. Diagnostic Value of
Wang B; Gao J; Zhang Q; Fu Y; Liu G; Shi J; Li D; Wang F; Guo H
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jun; 61(6):873-880. PubMed ID: 31757845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of
Gao J; Zhang C; Zhang Q; Fu Y; Zhao X; Chen M; Zhang B; Li D; Shi J; Wang F; Guo H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1531-1541. PubMed ID: 31025048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Findings in 1,123 Men with Preoperative
Raveenthiran S; Yaxley WJ; Franklin T; Coughlin G; Roberts M; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Wong D; McEwan L; Brown N; Parkinson R; Esler R; Yaxley JW
J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):573-580. PubMed ID: 34694140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Matched-Pair Comparison of
Rauscher I; Krönke M; König M; Gafita A; Maurer T; Horn T; Schiller K; Weber W; Eiber M
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jan; 61(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 31253741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined Utility of
Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Konety B; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 33741337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A single-center, multi-factor, retrospective study to improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary prostate cancer using [
Lv J; Yu H; Yin H; Shi Y; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Feb; 51(3):919-927. PubMed ID: 37940684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pilot study of the diagnostic utility of
Vlachostergios PJ; Niaz MJ; Thomas C; Christos PJ; Osborne JR; Margolis DJA; Khani F; Bander NH; Scherr DS; Tagawa ST
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):483-492. PubMed ID: 34985786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of
Chen M; Zhang Q; Zhang C; Zhao X; Marra G; Gao J; Lv X; Zhang B; Fu Y; Wang F; Qiu X; Guo H
J Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 60(7):944-949. PubMed ID: 30552201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of early imaging with
Özülker F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 30514659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gallium 68 PSMA-11 PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Park SY; Zacharias C; Harrison C; Fan RE; Kunder C; Hatami N; Giesel F; Ghanouni P; Daniel B; Loening AM; Sonn GA; Iagaru A
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):495-505. PubMed ID: 29786490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardised uptake values as determined on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.
Bodar YJL; Veerman H; Meijer D; de Bie K; van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk ML; van Moorselaar RJA; Hendrikse NH; Boellaard R; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
BJU Int; 2022 Jun; 129(6):768-776. PubMed ID: 35166426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and
Sawicki LM; Kirchner J; Buddensieck C; Antke C; Ullrich T; Schimmöller L; Boos J; Schleich C; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Heusch P; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Müller HW; Hautzel H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 30879122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pilot study comparing dominant intraprostatic lesion volume using Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-computed tomography and multiparametric MRI.
Sasidharan A; Murthy V; Natarajan A; Agarwal A; Ranagrajan V; Gudi S; Singh S; Popat P
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Dec; 41(12):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 32941400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
