611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31758225)
21. Prognostic value of metabolic variables of [18F]FDG PET/CT in surgically resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Wang XY; Zhao YF; Liu Y; Yang YK; Wu N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(35):e7941. PubMed ID: 28858121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu J; Dong M; Sun X; Li W; Xing L; Yu J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146195. PubMed ID: 26727114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Utility of Volumetric Metabolic Parameters on Preoperative FDG PET/CT for Predicting Tumor Lymphovascular Invasion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Li C; Tian Y; Shen Y; Wen B; He Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1433-1443. PubMed ID: 33978465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24.
Li Y; Wu X; Huang Y; Bian D; Jiang L
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 May; 34(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 32088884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic value of volumetric parameters measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer.
Kim K; Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Kim YS; Pak K; Kim H
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 22407127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Volume-Based Assessment With 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Outcome Prediction for Patients With Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Hyun SH; Ahn HK; Ahn MJ; Ahn YC; Kim J; Shim YM; Choi JY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):623-8. PubMed ID: 26295651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differential expression and prognostic significance of GLUT1 according to histologic type of non-small-cell lung cancer and its association with volume-dependent parameters.
Koh YW; Lee SJ; Park SY
Lung Cancer; 2017 Feb; 104():31-37. PubMed ID: 28212997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pretreatment quantitative
Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total metabolic tumor volume by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Pellegrino S; Fonti R; Mazziotti E; Piccin L; Mozzillo E; Damiano V; Matano E; De Placido S; Del Vecchio S
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Dec; 33(12):937-944. PubMed ID: 31612416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by
Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of novel quantitative techniques for fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Wang D; Koh ES; Descallar J; Pramana A; Vinod SK; Ho Shon I
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 12(4):349-358. PubMed ID: 27550522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated by non-surgical therapy.
Yan H; Wang R; Zhao F; Zhu K; Jiang S; Zhao W; Feng R
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):646-50. PubMed ID: 21508201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metabolic tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated definitively for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Lee P; Bazan JG; Lavori PW; Weerasuriya DK; Quon A; Le QT; Wakelee HA; Graves EE; Loo BW
Clin Lung Cancer; 2012 Jan; 13(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 21703935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of baseline
Xia L; Li X; Zhu J; Gao Z; Zhang J; Yang G; Wang Z
Radiat Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(1):41. PubMed ID: 36829219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and correlation with PET-CT metabolic parameters in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Mirili C; Guney IB; Paydas S; Seydaoglu G; Kapukaya TK; Ogul A; Gokcay S; Buyuksimsek M; Yetisir AE; Karaalioglu B; Tohumcuoglu M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 24(2):168-178. PubMed ID: 30109543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Metabolic parameters of [
Markus M; Sartor H; Bjurberg M; Trägårdh E
Acta Oncol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):180-188. PubMed ID: 36815676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of
Rudžianskas V; Korobeinikova E; Rudžianskienė M; Jaselskė E; Adlienė D; Šedienė S; Kulakienė I; Padervinskis E; Jurkienė N; Juozaitytė E
Medicina (Kaunas); 2018 Dec; 54(6):. PubMed ID: 30544718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
