These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31758279)

  • 1. Spectral and Temporal Envelope Cues for Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Hu G; Determan SC; Dong Y; Beeve AT; Collins JE; Gai Y
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 31758279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
    Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition.
    Kong YY; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2830-40. PubMed ID: 17139741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.
    Narayanan A; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3083-93. PubMed ID: 23654411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues.
    Parikh G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3874-88. PubMed ID: 16419830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?
    Souza PE; Ellis G; Marks K; Wright R; Gallun F
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6):2053-2069. PubMed ID: 34019777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.
    Alexander JM; Masterson K
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e35-49. PubMed ID: 25470368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Kong YY; Donaldson G; Somarowthu A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2846-57. PubMed ID: 25994712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dichotic speech recognition in noise using reduced spectral cues.
    Loizou PC; Mani A; Dorman MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):475-83. PubMed ID: 12880058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.