162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31758466)
1. Label-Based Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Robust Quantification of the Phosphoproteome and Total Proteome in Toxoplasma gondii.
Broncel M; Treeck M
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2071():453-468. PubMed ID: 31758466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep Profiling of Proteome and Phosphoproteome by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, and Mass Spectrometry.
Bai B; Tan H; Pagala VR; High AA; Ichhaporia VP; Hendershot L; Peng J
Methods Enzymol; 2017; 585():377-395. PubMed ID: 28109439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phosphopeptide Enrichment and LC-MS/MS Analysis to Study the Phosphoproteome of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells.
Henry M; Coleman O; Prashant ; Clynes M; Meleady P
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1603():195-208. PubMed ID: 28493132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehensive phosphoproteome analysis of INS-1 pancreatic β-cells using various digestion strategies coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Han D; Moon S; Kim Y; Ho WK; Kim K; Kang Y; Jun H; Kim Y
J Proteome Res; 2012 Apr; 11(4):2206-23. PubMed ID: 22276854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics.
Batth TS; Francavilla C; Olsen JV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):6176-86. PubMed ID: 25338131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The phosphoproteomes of Plasmodium falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii reveal unusual adaptations within and beyond the parasites' boundaries.
Treeck M; Sanders JL; Elias JE; Boothroyd JC
Cell Host Microbe; 2011 Oct; 10(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 22018241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining Metabolic ¹⁵N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome.
Thomas M; Huck N; Hoehenwarter W; Conrath U; Beckers GJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1306():81-96. PubMed ID: 25930695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Isotope-labeling and affinity enrichment of phosphopeptides for proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Kota U; Chien KY; Goshe MB
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 564():303-21. PubMed ID: 19544030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multidimensional electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) for quantitative analysis of the proteome and phosphoproteome in clinical and biomedical research.
Loroch S; Schommartz T; Brune W; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1854(5):460-8. PubMed ID: 25619855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phosphoproteome analysis of human liver tissue by long-gradient nanoflow LC coupled with multiple stage MS analysis.
Han G; Ye M; Liu H; Song C; Sun D; Wu Y; Jiang X; Chen R; Wang C; Wang L; Zou H
Electrophoresis; 2010 Mar; 31(6):1080-9. PubMed ID: 20166139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying Proteome and Protein Modifications in Activated T Cells by Multiplexed Isobaric Labeling Mass Spectrometry.
Tan H; Blanco DB; Xie B; Li Y; Wu Z; Chi H; Peng J
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2285():297-317. PubMed ID: 33928561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of SILAC Labeling in Phosphoproteomics Analysis.
Stepath M; Bracht T
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2228():167-183. PubMed ID: 33950491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phosphoproteome Analysis in Immune Cell Signaling.
Rathore D; Nita-Lazar A
Curr Protoc Immunol; 2020 Sep; 130(1):e105. PubMed ID: 32936995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC)-Based Quantitative Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics in Fission Yeast.
Carpy A; Koch A; Bicho CC; Borek WE; Hauf S; Sawin KE; Maček B
Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2017 Jun; 2017(6):pdb.prot091686. PubMed ID: 28572185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Mertins P; Tang LC; Krug K; Clark DJ; Gritsenko MA; Chen L; Clauser KR; Clauss TR; Shah P; Gillette MA; Petyuk VA; Thomas SN; Mani DR; Mundt F; Moore RJ; Hu Y; Zhao R; Schnaubelt M; Keshishian H; Monroe ME; Zhang Z; Udeshi ND; Mani D; Davies SR; Townsend RR; Chan DW; Smith RD; Zhang H; Liu T; Carr SA
Nat Protoc; 2018 Jul; 13(7):1632-1661. PubMed ID: 29988108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different fractionation strategies for in-depth phosphoproteomics by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Yeh TT; Ho MY; Chen WY; Hsu YC; Ku WC; Tseng HW; Chen ST; Chen SF
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Jun; 411(15):3417-3424. PubMed ID: 31011783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the Phosphoproteome Coverage for Limited Sample Amounts Using TiO2-SIMAC-HILIC (TiSH) Phosphopeptide Enrichment and Fractionation.
Engholm-Keller K; Larsen MR
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1355():161-77. PubMed ID: 26584925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of Direct Kinase Substrates Using Analogue-Sensitive Alleles.
Rothenberg DA; Gordon EA; White FM; Lourido S
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1355():71-84. PubMed ID: 26584919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Daily changes in the phosphoproteome of the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium.
Liu B; Lo SC; Matton DP; Lang BF; Morse D
Protist; 2012 Sep; 163(5):746-54. PubMed ID: 22169124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tools for analyzing the phosphoproteome and other phosphorylated biomolecules: a review.
Leitner A; Sturm M; Lindner W
Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Oct; 703(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 21843671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
