167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31758738)
1. External validation of novel magnetic resonance imaging-based models for prostate cancer prediction.
Püllen L; Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Wetter A; Guberina N; Pandey A; Hüttenbrink C; Tschirdewahn S; Pahernik S; Hadaschik BA; Distler FA
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):407-416. PubMed ID: 31758738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External validation and comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-based predictive models for clinically significant prostate cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee A; Yang XY; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WK; Lee LS; Ho HS; Cheng CW; Yuen JS; Tay KJ; Chen K
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):783.e1-783.e10. PubMed ID: 33775528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: Validation of a novel risk model combining MRI and clinical parameters and comparison to an ERSPC risk calculator and PI-RADS.
Radtke JP; Giganti F; Wiesenfarth M; Stabile A; Marenco J; Orczyk C; Kasivisvanathan V; Nyarangi-Dix JN; Schütz V; Dieffenbacher S; Görtz M; Stenzinger A; Roth W; Freeman A; Punwani S; Bonekamp D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Emberton M; Moore CM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221350. PubMed ID: 31450235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel Risk Calculator Incorporating Clinical Parameters, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Before Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.
Kelly BD; Ptasznik G; Roberts MJ; Doan P; Stricker P; Thompson J; Buteau J; Chen K; Alghazo O; O'Brien JS; Hofman MS; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Lundon D; Murphy DG; Emmett L; Moon D
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2023 Jul; 53():90-97. PubMed ID: 37441340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prostate biopsy risk calculator based on MRI: development and comparison of the Prospective Loyola University multiparametric MRI (PLUM) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
BJU Int; 2023 Feb; 131(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 35733400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing prostate biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging with prostate cancer risk stratification.
Davik P; Remmers S; Elschot M; Roobol MJ; Bathen TF; Bertilsson H
BJUI Compass; 2022 Sep; 3(5):344-353. PubMed ID: 35950035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of prostate cancer prediction models in men undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal biopsy: Are the models still relevant?
Doan P; Graham P; Lahoud J; Remmers S; Roobol MJ; Kim L; Patel MI
BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128 Suppl 3():36-44. PubMed ID: 34374190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Deniffel D; Healy GM; Dong X; Ghai S; Salinas-Miranda E; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Perlis N; Haider MA
Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 34032510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the ERSPC Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Dutch Clinical Cohort.
Gayet M; Mannaerts CK; Nieboer D; Beerlage HP; Wijkstra H; Mulders PFA; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):228-234. PubMed ID: 28753781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer risk prediction using the novel versions of the European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculators: independent validation and comparison in a contemporary European cohort.
Poyet C; Nieboer D; Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Wiederkehr C; Wettstein MS; Largo R; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T
BJU Int; 2016 Mar; 117(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 26332503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the prediction of prostate biopsy outcome using the Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium (CPCC) Risk Calculator and the Asian adapted Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator in Chinese and European men.
Chen R; Verbeek JFM; Yang Y; Song Z; Sun Y; Roobol MJ
World J Urol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 32279141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clash of the calculators: External validation of prostate cancer risk calculators in men undergoing mpMRI and transperineal biopsy.
Wei G; Kelly BD; Timm B; Perera M; Lundon DJ; Jack G; Bolton DM
BJUI Compass; 2021 May; 2(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 35475133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators significantly outperform the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) 2.0 in the prediction of prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study.
Foley RW; Maweni RM; Gorman L; Murphy K; Lundon DJ; Durkan G; Power R; O'Brien F; O'Malley KJ; Galvin DJ; Brendan Murphy T; William Watson R
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):706-713. PubMed ID: 26833820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category.
Morote J; Campistol M; Triquell M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():38-44. PubMed ID: 35243388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators.
Falagario UG; Martini A; Wajswol E; Treacy PJ; Ratnani P; Jambor I; Anastos H; Lewis S; Haines K; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Rastinehad AR; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):700-704. PubMed ID: 31548130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
