These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31758793)

  • 1. Dynamic landmark prediction for mixture data.
    Garcia TP; Parast L
    Biostatistics; 2021 Jul; 22(3):558-574. PubMed ID: 31758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of joint modeling and landmarking for dynamic prediction under an illness-death model.
    Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Spratt DE; Daignault S; Tsodikov A
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1277-1300. PubMed ID: 28508545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random survival forests for dynamic predictions of a time-to-event outcome using a longitudinal biomarker.
    Pickett KL; Suresh K; Campbell KR; Davis S; Juarez-Colunga E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):216. PubMed ID: 34657597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities in partially non-Markov multi-state models.
    Maltzahn N; Hoff R; Aalen OO; Mehlum IS; Putter H; Gran JM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Oct; 27(4):737-760. PubMed ID: 34595580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Landmark risk prediction of residual life for breast cancer survival.
    Parast L; Cai T
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3459-71. PubMed ID: 23494768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landmark Prediction of Survival for Breast Cancer Patients: A Case Study in Tehran, Iran.
    Alafchi B; Tapak L; Hamidi O; Poorolajal J; Mahjub H
    Iran J Public Health; 2019 Dec; 48(12):2249-2259. PubMed ID: 31993394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landmark cure rate models with time-dependent covariates.
    Shi H; Yin G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2042-2054. PubMed ID: 28627311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for prediction calibration.
    Brooks J; van der Laan MJ; Go AS
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Oct; 8(1):30. PubMed ID: 23152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Prediction of Survival in Cystic Fibrosis: A Landmarking Analysis Using UK Patient Registry Data.
    Keogh RH; Seaman SR; Barrett JK; Taylor-Robinson D; Szczesniak R
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 30234550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation in the progressive illness-death model: A nonexhaustive review.
    Meira-Machado L; Sestelo M
    Biom J; 2019 Mar; 61(2):245-263. PubMed ID: 30457674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A copula-based approach for dynamic prediction of survival with a binary time-dependent covariate.
    Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Tsodikov A
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):4931-4946. PubMed ID: 34124771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual dynamic predictions using landmarking and joint modelling: Validation of estimators and robustness assessment.
    Ferrer L; Putter H; Proust-Lima C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3649-3666. PubMed ID: 30463497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-parametric estimation of transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models: The landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator.
    Putter H; Spitoni C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):2081-2092. PubMed ID: 29846146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landmarking 2.0: Bridging the gap between joint models and landmarking.
    Putter H; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1901-1917. PubMed ID: 35098578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic prediction and prognostic analysis of patients with cervical cancer: a landmarking analysis approach.
    Yang Z; Hou Y; Lyu J; Liu D; Chen Z
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 44():45-51. PubMed ID: 32220511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Landmark estimation of transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models with covariates.
    Hoff R; Putter H; Mehlum IS; Gran JM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Oct; 25(4):660-680. PubMed ID: 30997582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An R
    Fournier MC; Dantan E; Blanche P
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 29205452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modification of the Greenwood formula for correlated response times.
    Kang SS; Koehler KJ
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):885-99. PubMed ID: 9290220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic Prediction of Renal Failure Using Longitudinal Biomarkers in a Cohort Study of Chronic Kidney Disease.
    Li L; Luo S; Hu B; Greene T
    Stat Biosci; 2017 Dec; 9(2):357-378. PubMed ID: 29250207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.