These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31759063)

  • 1. Methodological and reporting quality in non-Cochrane systematic review updates could be improved: a comparative study.
    Gao Y; Cai Y; Yang K; Liu M; Shi S; Chen J; Sun Y; Song F; Zhang J; Tian J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():36-46. PubMed ID: 31759063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on health effects of air pollutants were higher than extreme temperatures: a comparative study.
    Song X; Luo Q; Jiang L; Ma Y; Hu Y; Han Y; Wang R; Tang J; Guo Y; Zhang Q; Ma Z; Zhang Y; Guo X; Fan S; Deng C; Fu X; Chen Y; Yang K; Ge L; Wang S
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):2371. PubMed ID: 38031053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(1):117. PubMed ID: 28629396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
    Ross A; Rankin J; Beaman J; Murray K; Sinnett P; Riddle R; Haskins J; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
    Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
    Gao Y; Ge L; Ma X; Shen X; Liu M; Tian J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():214-227. PubMed ID: 31150834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines Focused on the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Cross-Sectional Analysis.
    Khalid M; Sutterfield B; Minley K; Ottwell R; Abercrombie M; Heath C; Torgerson T; Hartwell M; Vassar M
    JMIR Dermatol; 2023 Dec; 6():e43821. PubMed ID: 38060306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of reporting among systematic reviews underpinning the ESC/ACC guidelines on ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.
    Garrett EP; Hightower B; Walters C; Srouji D; Chronister J; Torgerson T; Hartwell M; McIntire R; Love M; Vassar M
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2022 Dec; 27(6):352-360. PubMed ID: 35277437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Evaluation of Evidence Underpinning Management Recommendations in Tobacco Use Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Streck S; McIntire R; Canale L; Michael Anderson J; Hartwell M; Torgerson T; Dunn K; Vassar M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2022 Apr; 24(6):847-854. PubMed ID: 35023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2.
    Guan X; Lao Y; Wang J; Wang Y; Bai Y; Li X; Liu S; Li Z; Li F; Dong Z
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):281. PubMed ID: 38012566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines.
    Zhang X; Aixinjueluo QY; Li SY; Song LL; Lau CT; Tan R; Bian ZX
    Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):302. PubMed ID: 31796121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.