These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31759063)

  • 21. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
    Sharma S; Oremus M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment.
    Belloti JC; Okamura A; Scheeren J; Faloppa F; Ynoe de Moraes V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206895. PubMed ID: 30673700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of systematic reviews on acupuncture in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review.
    Luo YN; Zheng QH; Liu ZB; Zhang FR; Chen Y; Li Y
    Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2018 Nov; 33():197-203. PubMed ID: 30396621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study.
    Bojcic R; Todoric M; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111210. PubMed ID: 37931822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of network meta-analyses in anesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological study.
    Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 Sep; 70(9):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 37420161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
    Ho L; Ke FYT; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Cheung AKL; Mao C; Chung VCH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):237. PubMed ID: 34717563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study.
    Karakasis P; Bougioukas KI; Pamporis K; Fragakis N; Haidich AB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 37956538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
    Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
    Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
    Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
    Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overview of "Systematic Reviews" of the Built Environment's Effects on Mental Health.
    Núñez-González S; Delgado-Ron JA; Gault C; Lara-Vinueza A; Calle-Celi D; Porreca R; Simancas-Racines D
    J Environ Public Health; 2020; 2020():9523127. PubMed ID: 32256618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
    Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review.
    Wang X; Welch V; Li M; Yao L; Littell J; Li H; Yang N; Wang J; Shamseer L; Chen Y; Yang K; Grimshaw JM
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 17(1):e1134. PubMed ID: 37133262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationships between abstract features and methodological quality explained variations of social media activity derived from systematic reviews about psoriasis interventions.
    Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Isla-Tejera B; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; Gómez-García F; García-Nieto AV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():35-43. PubMed ID: 29803759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews.
    Zhong D; Xiao Q; Xiao X; Li Y; Ye J; Xia L; Zhang C; Li J; Zheng H; Jin R
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Nov; 63(6):505-517. PubMed ID: 31981834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.