These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31759277)

  • 1. The dark side of Eureka: Artificially induced Aha moments make facts feel true.
    Laukkonen RE; Kaveladze BT; Tangen JM; Schooler JW
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104122. PubMed ID: 31759277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true.
    Laukkonen RE; Kaveladze BT; Protzko J; Tangen JM; von Hippel W; Schooler JW
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2075. PubMed ID: 35136131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where Does Eureka Come From? The Effect of Unreportable Hints on the Phenomenology of Insight.
    Ammalainen A; Moroshkina N
    J Intell; 2022 Nov; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 36412790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Getting a grip on insight: real-time and embodied Aha experiences predict correct solutions.
    Laukkonen RE; Ingledew DJ; Grimmer HJ; Schooler JW; Tangen JM
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Aug; 35(5):918-935. PubMed ID: 33829955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insight and the selection of ideas.
    Laukkonen RE; Webb M; Salvi C; Tangen JM; Slagter HA; Schooler JW
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2023 Oct; 153():105363. PubMed ID: 37598874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliciting false insights with semantic priming.
    Grimmer H; Laukkonen R; Tangen J; von Hippel W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):954-970. PubMed ID: 35112311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thinking style and psychosis proneness do not predict false insights.
    Grimmer HJ; Laukkonen RE; Freydenzon A; von Hippel W; Tangen JM
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Sep; 104():103384. PubMed ID: 35933801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feelings-of-Warmth Increase More Abruptly for Verbal Riddles Solved With in Contrast to Without Aha! Experience.
    Kizilirmak JM; Serger V; Kehl J; Öllinger M; Folta-Schoofs K; Richardson-Klavehn A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1404. PubMed ID: 30150953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The illusion of insight: detailed warnings reduce but do not prevent false "Aha!" moments.
    Grimmer HJ; Tangen JM; Freydenzon A; Laukkonen RE
    Cogn Emot; 2023 Mar; 37(2):329-338. PubMed ID: 36883217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What causes the insight memory advantage?
    Danek AH; Wiley J
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104411. PubMed ID: 32762872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "The Penny Drops": Investigating Insight Through the Medium of Cryptic Crosswords.
    Friedlander KJ; Fine PA
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():904. PubMed ID: 30018576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aha! and D'oh! experiences enhance learning for incidental information-new evidence supports the insight memory advantage.
    Salvi C; Keller N; Cooper SE; Leiker E; Dunsmoor J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):505-516. PubMed ID: 38538933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How and When? Metacognition and Solution Timing Characterize an "Aha" Experience of Object Recognition in Hidden Figures.
    Ishikawa T; Toshima M; Mogi K
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1023. PubMed ID: 31178774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intuitive Feelings of Warmth and Confidence in Insight and Noninsight Problem Solving of Magic Tricks.
    Hedne MR; Norman E; Metcalfe J
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1314. PubMed ID: 27630598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surprise!-Clarifying the link between insight and prediction error.
    Becker M; Wang X; Cabeza R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38743215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pre-stimulus brain oscillations predict insight versus analytic problem-solving in an anagram task.
    Zhu X; Oh Y; Chesebrough C; Zhang F; Kounios J
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108044. PubMed ID: 34610344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In search of the 'Aha!' experience: Elucidating the emotionality of insight problem-solving.
    Shen W; Yuan Y; Liu C; Luo J
    Br J Psychol; 2016 May; 107(2):281-98. PubMed ID: 26184903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It's a kind of magic-what self-reports can reveal about the phenomenology of insight problem solving.
    Danek AH; Fraps T; von Müller A; Grothe B; Öllinger M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1408. PubMed ID: 25538658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What about False Insights? Deconstructing the Aha! Experience along Its Multiple Dimensions for Correct and Incorrect Solutions Separately.
    Danek AH; Wiley J
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():2077. PubMed ID: 28163687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Connect 4: A Novel Paradigm to Elicit Positive and Negative Insight and Search Problem Solving.
    Hill G; Kemp SM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1755. PubMed ID: 30410453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.