These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51- or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms. Moriel-Carretero M; Aguilera A Mol Cell; 2010 Mar; 37(5):690-701. PubMed ID: 20227372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ATR Protects the Genome against R Loops through a MUS81-Triggered Feedback Loop. Matos DA; Zhang JM; Ouyang J; Nguyen HD; Genois MM; Zou L Mol Cell; 2020 Feb; 77(3):514-527.e4. PubMed ID: 31708417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Homologous recombination and Mus81 promote replication completion in response to replication fork blockage. Pardo B; Moriel-Carretero M; Vicat T; Aguilera A; Pasero P EMBO Rep; 2020 Jul; 21(7):e49367. PubMed ID: 32419301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival of the replication checkpoint deficient cells requires MUS81-RAD52 function. Murfuni I; Basile G; Subramanyam S; Malacaria E; Bignami M; Spies M; Franchitto A; Pichierri P PLoS Genet; 2013 Oct; 9(10):e1003910. PubMed ID: 24204313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Super-resolution visualization of distinct stalled and broken replication fork structures. Whelan DR; Lee WTC; Marks F; Kong YT; Yin Y; Rothenberg E PLoS Genet; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1009256. PubMed ID: 33370257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells. Thangavel S; Berti M; Levikova M; Pinto C; Gomathinayagam S; Vujanovic M; Zellweger R; Moore H; Lee EH; Hendrickson EA; Cejka P; Stewart S; Lopes M; Vindigni A J Cell Biol; 2015 Mar; 208(5):545-62. PubMed ID: 25733713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mus81 is essential for sister chromatid recombination at broken replication forks. Roseaulin L; Yamada Y; Tsutsui Y; Russell P; Iwasaki H; Arcangioli B EMBO J; 2008 May; 27(9):1378-87. PubMed ID: 18388861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Replication fork stalling in WRN-deficient cells is overcome by prompt activation of a MUS81-dependent pathway. Franchitto A; Pirzio LM; Prosperi E; Sapora O; Bignami M; Pichierri P J Cell Biol; 2008 Oct; 183(2):241-52. PubMed ID: 18852298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities. Torres JZ; Schnakenberg SL; Zakian VA Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 24(8):3198-212. PubMed ID: 15060144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance. González-Prieto R; Muñoz-Cabello AM; Cabello-Lobato MJ; Prado F EMBO J; 2013 May; 32(9):1307-21. PubMed ID: 23563117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks. Osman F; Whitby MC DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mus81-Eme1 and Rqh1 involvement in processing stalled and collapsed replication forks. Doe CL; Ahn JS; Dixon J; Whitby MC J Biol Chem; 2002 Sep; 277(36):32753-9. PubMed ID: 12084712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments. Kolinjivadi AM; Sannino V; De Antoni A; Zadorozhny K; Kilkenny M; Técher H; Baldi G; Shen R; Ciccia A; Pellegrini L; Krejci L; Costanzo V Mol Cell; 2017 Sep; 67(5):867-881.e7. PubMed ID: 28757209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rad52 prevents excessive replication fork reversal and protects from nascent strand degradation. Malacaria E; Pugliese GM; Honda M; Marabitti V; Aiello FA; Spies M; Franchitto A; Pichierri P Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1412. PubMed ID: 30926821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]