BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31760206)

  • 1. Evaluating health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a mass-media campaign for improving participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
    Worthington J; Feletto E; Lew JB; Broun K; Durkin S; Wakefield M; Grogan P; Harper T; Canfell K
    Public Health; 2020 Feb; 179():90-99. PubMed ID: 31760206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.
    Worthington J; Lew JB; Feletto E; Holden CA; Worthley DL; Miller C; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0227899. PubMed ID: 32012174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Xu XM; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; Cenin DR; He E; Saville M; Grogan P; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2017 Jul; 2(7):e331-e340. PubMed ID: 29253458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a mass media campaign on participation in the Australian bowel cancer screening program.
    Durkin S; Broun K; Guerin N; Morley B; Wakefield M
    J Med Screen; 2020 Mar; 27(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 31530160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of a mass media campaign on participation rates in a National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: a field experiment.
    Durkin SJ; Broun K; Spittal MJ; Wakefield MA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e024267. PubMed ID: 30813110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
    Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Potential Age Extensions to the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1450-1461. PubMed ID: 30190276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
    Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
    PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing bowel cancer screening participation: integrating population-wide, primary care and more targeted approaches.
    Lofti-Jam KL; O'Reilly CL; Feng CS; Wakefield MA; Durkin S; Broun KH
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Engaging lower screening groups: a field experiment to evaluate the impact of a multiwave national campaign on participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
    Gascoyne C; Broun K; Morley B; Wyatt K; Feletto E; Durkin SJ
    BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e065124. PubMed ID: 36921953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: demonstrating the potential value of comprehensive real world data.
    Tran B; Keating CL; Ananda SS; Kosmider S; Jones I; Croxford M; Field KM; Carter RC; Gibbs P
    Intern Med J; 2012 Jul; 42(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 21883782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The SMARTscreen Trial: a randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a GP-endorsed narrative SMS to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
    Wood A; Emery JD; Jenkins M; Chondros P; Campbell T; Wenkart E; O'Reilly C; Cowie T; Dixon I; Toner J; Khalajzadeh H; Gutierrez JM; Govan L; Buckle G; McIntosh JG
    Trials; 2022 Jan; 23(1):31. PubMed ID: 35022080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: time to achieve its potential to save lives.
    Ee H; St John J
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SMARTERscreen protocol: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of patient SMS messaging in general practice to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
    McIntosh JG; Emery JD; Wood A; Chondros P; Goodwin BC; Trevena J; Wilson C; Chang S; Hocking J; Campbell T; Macrae F; Milley K; Lew JB; Nightingale C; Dixon I; Castelli M; Lee N; Innes L; Jolley T; Fletcher S; Buchanan L; Doncovio S; Broun K; Austin G; Jiang J; Jenkins MA
    Trials; 2023 Nov; 24(1):723. PubMed ID: 37957680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colonoscopies in Australia - how much does the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program contribute to colonoscopy use?
    Worthington J; He E; Lew JB; St John J; Horn C; Grogan P; Canfell K; Feletto E
    Public Health Res Pract; 2023 Mar; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 36477980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling cost-effective strategies for minimising socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening outcomes in England.
    Thomas C; Mandrik O; Whyte S
    Prev Med; 2022 Sep; 162():107131. PubMed ID: 35803353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change in public awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms following the Be Cancer Alert Campaign in the multi-ethnic population of Malaysia.
    Schliemann D; Paramasivam D; Dahlui M; Cardwell CR; Somasundaram S; Ibrahim Tamin NSB; Donnelly C; Su TT; Donnelly M
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):252. PubMed ID: 32213173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Costs and cost-effectiveness of full implementation of a biennial faecal occult blood test screening program for bowel cancer in Australia.
    Pignone MP; Flitcroft KL; Howard K; Trevena LJ; Salkeld GP; St John DJ
    Med J Aust; 2011 Feb; 194(4):180-5. PubMed ID: 21401458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The case for philanthropic investment to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: A novel paradigm to address a public health challenge.
    Carmeli A; Dranikoff L; Kundu A; Ladabaum U
    Cancer Med; 2020 Feb; 9(3):1220-1229. PubMed ID: 31808317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.