These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3176069)

  • 1. QSAR approaches to predicting toxicity.
    Dunn WJ
    Toxicol Lett; 1988 Oct; 43(1-3):277-83. PubMed ID: 3176069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of the QSAR and in vitro approaches for developing non-animal methods to supersede the in vivo LD50 test.
    Phillips JC; Gibson WB; Yam J; Alden CL; Hard GC
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1990 May; 28(5):375-94. PubMed ID: 2199353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: current status and future potential.
    Winkler DA; Mombelli E; Pietroiusti A; Tran L; Worth A; Fadeel B; McCall MJ
    Toxicology; 2013 Nov; 313(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 23165187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-modeling-based QSARs for analyzing experimental data on biotransformation and toxicity.
    Soffers AE; Boersma MG; Vaes WH; Vervoort J; Tyrakowska B; Hermens JL; Rietjens IM
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2001; 15(4-5):539-51. PubMed ID: 11566589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology.
    Singh KP; Gupta S; Kumar A; Mohan D
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 May; 27(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 24738471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Aquatic Narcosis: A Review.
    Adhikari C; Mishra BK
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2018; 14(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 28699497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. 4. Multi-target QSAR modeling and comparative multi-distance study of the giant components of antiviral drug-drug complex networks.
    Prado-Prado FJ; Martinez de la Vega O; Uriarte E; Ubeira FM; Chou KC; González-Díaz H
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2009 Jan; 17(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 19112024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. Part 3: first multi-tasking QSAR model for input-coded prediction, structural back-projection, and complex networks clustering of antiprotozoal compounds.
    Prado-Prado FJ; González-Díaz H; de la Vega OM; Ubeira FM; Chou KC
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 16(11):5871-80. PubMed ID: 18485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology.
    Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):323-30. PubMed ID: 15669692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In silico prediction of drug toxicity.
    Dearden JC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003; 17(2-4):119-27. PubMed ID: 13677480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outliers: their origin and use in the classification of molecular mechanisms of toxicity.
    Lipnick RL
    Sci Total Environ; 1991 Dec; 109-110():131-53. PubMed ID: 1815349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a general baseline toxicity QSAR model for the fish embryo acute toxicity test.
    Klüver N; Vogs C; Altenburger R; Escher BI; Scholz S
    Chemosphere; 2016 Dec; 164():164-173. PubMed ID: 27588575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: an overview.
    Bradbury SP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):89-104. PubMed ID: 8790641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
    Mansouri K; Judson RS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Substance-tailored testing strategies in toxicology: an in silico methodology based on QSAR modeling of toxicological thresholds and Monte Carlo simulations of toxicological testing.
    Péry AR; Desmots S; Mombelli E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19766156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toxicity study of allelochemical-like pesticides by a combination of 3D-QSAR, docking, Local Binding Energy (LBE) and GRID approaches.
    Fratev F; Lo Piparo E; Benfenati E; Mihaylova E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(7-8):675-92. PubMed ID: 18038367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: modeling soft electrophilicity.
    Schultz TW; Carlson RE; Cronin MT; Hermens JL; Johnson R; O'Brien PJ; Roberts DW; Siraki A; Wallace KB; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):413-28. PubMed ID: 16920662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Promises and pitfalls of quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for predicting metabolism and toxicity.
    Zvinavashe E; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 21(12):2229-36. PubMed ID: 19548346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic QSAR techniques: applications in drug design and toxicology.
    Mekenyan O
    Curr Pharm Des; 2002; 8(17):1605-21. PubMed ID: 12052203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure-activity relationship approaches and applications.
    Tong W; Welsh WJ; Shi L; Fang H; Perkins R
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1680-95. PubMed ID: 12924570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.