These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31761274)

  • 1. Guided implant scanning: A procedure for improving the accuracy of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Perales-Padilla P; Perales-Pulido P; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):135-139. PubMed ID: 31761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Gotsis S; Bokhary A; Sicilia E; Kudara Y; Bedrossian A; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altered reverse impression method involving extraoral digitalization of a verification jig for the fabrication of implant-supported prosthesis by using a complete-digital workflow.
    Rosmaninho A; Vedovato E; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):566-572. PubMed ID: 37882153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reverse scan body: The scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses.
    Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian EA; Ntovas P; Kudara Y; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):186-191. PubMed ID: 37721306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A fully digital approach for implant fixed complete dentures: A case report.
    Meneghetti P; Moura GF; Tavelli L; Li J; Siqueira R; Wang HL; Mendonça G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 34213055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flügge T; van der Meer WJ; Gonzalez BG; Vach K; Wismeijer D; Wang P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():374-392. PubMed ID: 30328182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: A pilot clinical trial.
    Roig E; Roig M; Garza LC; Costa S; Maia P; Espona J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 33610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
    Marinis A; Papaspyridakos P; Sicilia E; Bernandes SR; Touloumi F; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital verification and correction of digital intraoral scans for fixed implant rehabilitation of edentulous arches: A dental technique.
    Negreiros WM; Chanting Sun T; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):395-399. PubMed ID: 34229898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners.
    Di Fiore A; Meneghello R; Graiff L; Savio G; Vigolo P; Monaco C; Stellini E
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 31072730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photogrammetric and Intraoral Digital Impression Technique for the Rehabilitation of Multiple Unfavorably Positioned Dental Implants: A Clinical Report.
    Molinero-Mourelle P; Lam W; Cascos-Sánchez R; Azevedo L; Gómez-Polo M
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 31429638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: A systematic review.
    Paratelli A; Vania S; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):844-854. PubMed ID: 34756427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.
    Pesce P; Pera F; Setti P; Menini M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 29518813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 37789708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.