These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31761274)

  • 21. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters.
    Giménez B; Pradíes G; Martínez-Rus F; Özcan M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 25615916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study.
    Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Solaberrieta E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1250-1258. PubMed ID: 31610069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. All-on-four rehabilitation using photogrammetric impression technique.
    Sánchez-Monescillo A; Hernanz-Martín J; González-Serrano C; González-Serrano J; Duarte S
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 30887962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of scanning the palate and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans.
    Mizumoto RM; Alp G; Özcan M; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):987-994. PubMed ID: 31347253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Bilmenoglu C; Cilingir A; Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):755-760. PubMed ID: 31987587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of intraoral scan for implant-supported dental prosthesis to design and fabricate a CAD-CAM verification device: A dental technique.
    Su FY; Tsai JC; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):204-207. PubMed ID: 32307114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Partially digital workflow for making complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A dental technique.
    Carneiro Pereira AL; Pinto Campos MFT; Porto de Freitas RFC; Paiva Tôrres ACS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP; Porto Carreiro ADF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 34112523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
    Amin S; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 28039903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
    Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of scan body design on accuracy of the implant position as transferred to a virtual definitive implant cast.
    Revilla-León M; Smith Z; Methani MM; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):918-923. PubMed ID: 32493568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do Type and Shape of Scan Bodies Affect Accuracy and Time of Digital Implant Impressions?
    Moslemion M; Payaminia L; Jalali H; Alikhasi M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 Feb; 28(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 32036633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of digital fabrication options on the accuracy of dental implant-based single units and complete-arch frameworks.
    Abdel-Azim T; Zandinejad A; Elathamna E; Lin W; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1281-8. PubMed ID: 25265121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: An in vitro study?
    Pan Y; Tsoi JKH; Lam WYH; Chen Z; Pow EHN
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Mar; 33(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 34971468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Stapleton BM; Lin WS; Ntounis A; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 24831749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An additively manufactured intraoral scan body for aiding complete-arch intraoral implant digital scans with guided integration of 3D virtual representation.
    Pérez-Giugovaz MG; Mosier M; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 33413985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.