324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31761295)
1. Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.
Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Aschard H; Blum MGB
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Dec; 105(6):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 31761295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient Implementation of Penalized Regression for Genetic Risk Prediction.
Privé F; Aschard H; Blum MGB
Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 30808621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leveraging both individual-level genetic data and GWAS summary statistics increases polygenic prediction.
Albiñana C; Grove J; McGrath JJ; Agerbo E; Wray NR; Bulik CM; Nordentoft M; Hougaard DM; Werge T; Børglum AD; Mortensen PB; Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jun; 108(6):1001-1011. PubMed ID: 33964208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of polygenic prediction methodology within a reference-standardized framework.
Pain O; Glanville KP; Hagenaars SP; Selzam S; Fürtjes AE; Gaspar HA; Coleman JRI; Rimfeld K; Breen G; Plomin R; Folkersen L; Lewis CM
PLoS Genet; 2021 May; 17(5):e1009021. PubMed ID: 33945532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A principal component approach to improve association testing with polygenic risk scores.
Coombes BJ; Ploner A; Bergen SE; Biernacka JM
Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):676-686. PubMed ID: 32691445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polygenic scores via penalized regression on summary statistics.
Mak TSH; Porsch RM; Choi SW; Zhou X; Sham PC
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 41(6):469-480. PubMed ID: 28480976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significant sparse polygenic risk scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank.
Tanigawa Y; Qian J; Venkataraman G; Justesen JM; Li R; Tibshirani R; Hastie T; Rivas MA
PLoS Genet; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1010105. PubMed ID: 35324888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating genome-wide polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk to predict colorectal cancer diagnosis using UK Biobank data: population based cohort study.
Briggs SEW; Law P; East JE; Wordsworth S; Dunlop M; Houlston R; Hippisley-Cox J; Tomlinson I
BMJ; 2022 Nov; 379():e071707. PubMed ID: 36351667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing agreement between different polygenic risk scores in the UK Biobank.
Clifton L; Collister JA; Liu X; Littlejohns TJ; Hunter DJ
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12812. PubMed ID: 35896674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On polygenic risk scores for complex traits prediction.
Zhao B; Zou F
Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 33786811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benchmarking multi-ancestry prostate cancer polygenic risk scores in a real-world cohort.
Shah Y; Kulm S; Nauseef JT; Chen Z; Elemento O; Kensler KH; Sharaf RN
PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Apr; 20(4):e1011990. PubMed ID: 38598551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data.
Shi J; Park JH; Duan J; Berndt ST; Moy W; Yu K; Song L; Wheeler W; Hua X; Silverman D; Garcia-Closas M; Hsiung CA; Figueroa JD; Cortessis VK; Malats N; Karagas MR; Vineis P; Chang IS; Lin D; Zhou B; Seow A; Matsuo K; Hong YC; Caporaso NE; Wolpin B; Jacobs E; Petersen GM; Klein AP; Li D; Risch H; Sanders AR; Hsu L; Schoen RE; Brenner H; ; ; ; ; ; ; Stolzenberg-Solomon R; Gejman P; Lan Q; Rothman N; Amundadottir LT; Landi MT; Levinson DF; Chanock SJ; Chatterjee N
PLoS Genet; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006493. PubMed ID: 28036406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.
Mostafavi H; Harpak A; Agarwal I; Conley D; Pritchard JK; Przeworski M
Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31999256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer PRSweb: An Online Repository with Polygenic Risk Scores for Major Cancer Traits and Their Evaluation in Two Independent Biobanks.
Fritsche LG; Patil S; Beesley LJ; VandeHaar P; Salvatore M; Ma Y; Peng RB; Taliun D; Zhou X; Mukherjee B
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):815-836. PubMed ID: 32991828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene-Environment Interactions in Multiple Sclerosis: A UK Biobank Study.
Jacobs BM; Noyce AJ; Bestwick J; Belete D; Giovannoni G; Dobson R
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm; 2021 Jul; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 34049995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort.
Privé F; Aschard H; Carmi S; Folkersen L; Hoggart C; O'Reilly PF; Vilhjálmsson BJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Jan; 109(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 34995502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method for multiancestry polygenic prediction improves performance across diverse populations.
Zhang H; Zhan J; Jin J; Zhang J; Lu W; Zhao R; Ahearn TU; Yu Z; O'Connell J; Jiang Y; Chen T; Okuhara D; ; Garcia-Closas M; Lin X; Koelsch BL; Chatterjee N
Nat Genet; 2023 Oct; 55(10):1757-1768. PubMed ID: 37749244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving polygenic risk prediction from summary statistics by an empirical Bayes approach.
So HC; Sham PC
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():41262. PubMed ID: 28145530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring various polygenic risk scores for skin cancer in the phenomes of the Michigan genomics initiative and the UK Biobank with a visual catalog: PRSWeb.
Fritsche LG; Beesley LJ; VandeHaar P; Peng RB; Salvatore M; Zawistowski M; Gagliano Taliun SA; Das S; LeFaive J; Kaleba EO; Klumpner TT; Moser SE; Blanc VM; Brummett CM; Kheterpal S; Abecasis GR; Gruber SB; Mukherjee B
PLoS Genet; 2019 Jun; 15(6):e1008202. PubMed ID: 31194742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient polygenic risk scores for biobank scale data by exploiting phenotypes from inferred relatives.
Truong B; Zhou X; Shin J; Li J; van der Werf JHJ; Le TD; Lee SH
Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):3074. PubMed ID: 32555176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
