These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31761434)

  • 1. Real-time feedback to reduce low-back load in lifting and lowering.
    Punt M; Nematimoez M; van Dieën JH; Kingma I
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109513. PubMed ID: 31761434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical demands on the lower back in patients with non-chronic low back pain during a symmetric lowering and lifting task.
    Shojaei I; Salt EG; Hooker Q; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():255-261. PubMed ID: 28712541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Position sense in the lumbar spine with torso flexion and loading.
    Gade VK; Wilson SE
    J Appl Biomech; 2007 May; 23(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 17603129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Load Knowledge on Biomechanics of Asymmetric Lifting.
    Liu J; Qu X; Liu Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35328894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Movement-based feedback may reduce spinal moments in male workers during lift and lowering tasks.
    Kernozek T; Iwasaki M; Fater D; Durall C; Langenhorst B
    Physiother Res Int; 2006 Sep; 11(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 17019943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regressionally determined vertebral inclination angles of the lumbar spine in static lifts.
    Lee YH; Chen YL
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Nov; 15(9):672-7. PubMed ID: 10946100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting.
    Koopman AS; Toxiri S; Power V; Kingma I; van Dieën JH; Ortiz J; de Looze MP
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun; 91():14-22. PubMed ID: 31122661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lumbar Facet Joint Kinematics and Load Effects During Dynamic Lifting.
    Chowdhury SK; Byrne RM; Zhou Y; Zhang X
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1130-1145. PubMed ID: 30074402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spasm and flexion-relaxation phenomenon response to large lifting load during the performance of a trunk flexion-extension exercise.
    Ma Y; Shan X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Nov; 18(1):505. PubMed ID: 29187168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint moments and muscle activity in the lower extremities and lower back in lifting and lowering tasks.
    de Looze MP; Toussaint HM; van Dieën JH; Kemper HC
    J Biomech; 1993 Sep; 26(9):1067-76. PubMed ID: 8408089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of lifting and lowering an external load on repositioning error of trunk flexion-extension in subjects with and without low back pain.
    Lin YH; Sun MH
    Clin Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 20(7):603-8. PubMed ID: 16894803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Low back load reduction using mechanical lift during transfer of patients].
    Tomioka K; Sakae K; Yasuda J
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2008 Jul; 50(4):103-10. PubMed ID: 18566524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo implant forces acting on a vertebral body replacement during upper body flexion.
    Dreischarf M; Albiol L; Zander T; Arshad R; Graichen F; Bergmann G; Schmidt H; Rohlmann A
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(4):560-565. PubMed ID: 25640900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load-relaxation properties of the human trunk in response to prolonged flexion: measuring and modeling the effect of flexion angle.
    Toosizadeh N; Nussbaum MA; Bazrgari B; Madigan ML
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48625. PubMed ID: 23144913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time-varying response of the in vivo lumbar spine to dynamic repetitive flexion.
    Parkinson RJ; Beach TA; Callaghan JP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 15109751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and its interaction with task parameters on lifting biomechanics.
    Song J; Qu X
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 24655323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does intra-lumbar flexion during lifting differ in manual workers with and without a history of low back pain? A cross-sectional laboratory study.
    Saraceni N; Campbell A; Kent P; Ng L; Straker L; O'Sullivan P
    Ergonomics; 2022 Oct; 65(10):1380-1396. PubMed ID: 35098885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Mobile Application to Measure Trunk Flexion Angles in Lifting Tasks.
    Barrett JM; Karakolis T; Callaghan JP
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 32673166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.