223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31761497)
1. Potential Pitfalls in Diagnostic Digital Image Analysis: Experience with Ki-67 and PHH3 in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Hacking SM; Sajjan S; Lee L; Ziemba Y; Angert M; Yang Y; Jin C; Chavarria H; Kataria N; Jain S; Nasim M
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Mar; 216(3):152753. PubMed ID: 31761497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.
Tang LH; Gonen M; Hedvat C; Modlin IM; Klimstra DS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1761-70. PubMed ID: 23026928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Image Analysis of the Proliferation Markers Ki67 and Phosphohistone H3 in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Accuracy of Grading Compared With Routine Manual Hot Spot Evaluation of the Ki67 Index.
Lea D; Gudlaugsson EG; Skaland I; Lillesand M; Søreide K; Søreide JA
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2021 Aug; 29(7):499-505. PubMed ID: 33758143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements.
Boukhar SA; Gosse MD; Bellizzi AM; Rajan K D A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Sep; 156(4):607-619. PubMed ID: 33847759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Phosphohistone-H3-Assisted Mitotic Count and Ki67 Score in the Determination of Tumor Grade and Prediction of Distant Metastasis in Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Ozturk Sari S; Taskin OC; Gundogdu G; Yegen G; Onder S; Keskin M; Saglam S; Ozluk Y; Gulluoglu M; Mete O
Endocr Pathol; 2016 Jun; 27(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 26936845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ki-67 proliferation index in neuroendocrine tumors: Can augmented reality microscopy with image analysis improve scoring?
Satturwar SP; Pantanowitz JL; Manko CD; Seigh L; Monaco SE; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Aug; 128(8):535-544. PubMed ID: 32401429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phosphohistone H3 and Ki-67 labeling indices in cytologic specimens from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas: a comparative analysis using automated image cytometry.
Fung AD; Cohen C; Kavuri S; Lawson D; Gao X; Reid MD
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 24021213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ki67 index and mitotic count: Correlation and variables affecting the accuracy of the quantification in endocrine/neuroendocrine tumors.
Huang W; Nebiolo C; Esbona K; Hu R; Lloyd R
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Oct; 48():151586. PubMed ID: 32836178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a Cytotechnologist Manual Counting Service for the Ki67 Index in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas and Gastrointestinal Tract.
Cottenden J; Filter ER; Cottreau J; Moore D; Bullock M; Huang WY; Arnason T
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Mar; 142(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 29293020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.
Luchini C; Pantanowitz L; Adsay V; Asa SL; Antonini P; Girolami I; Veronese N; Nottegar A; Cingarlini S; Landoni L; Brosens LA; Verschuur AV; Mattiolo P; Pea A; Mafficini A; Milella M; Niazi MK; Gurcan MN; Eccher A; Cree IA; Scarpa A
Mod Pathol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):712-720. PubMed ID: 35249100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Risk Stratification Utilizing Phospho-Histone H3 Evaluated by Manual Counting and Computer-Assisted Image Analysis.
Jin C; Huang Y; Nasim M; Yang Y; Lee L
Int J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 27(7):706-712. PubMed ID: 31146625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of Phosphohistone H3 Cutoff Values Corresponding to Original WHO Grades but Distinguishable in Well-Differentiated Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Kim MJ; Kwon MJ; Kang HS; Choi KC; Nam ES; Cho SJ; Park HR; Min SK; Seo J; Choe JY; Park HC
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1013640. PubMed ID: 29780816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immunostaining of phospho-histone H3 and Ki-67 improves reproducibility of recurrence risk assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Uguen A; Conq G; Doucet L; Talagas M; Costa S; De Braekeleer M; Marcorelles P
Virchows Arch; 2015 Jul; 467(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 25823616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Heterogeneity Improves the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Zhang M; Tan C; Wang X; Ding X; Zhang B; Yang Z; Wang Y; Sheng W; Huang D
Mod Pathol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):100017. PubMed ID: 36788066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of mitosis counting by automated phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) digital image analysis in a breast carcinoma tissue microarray.
Dessauvagie BF; Thomas C; Robinson C; Frost FA; Harvey J; Sterrett GF
Pathology; 2015 Jun; 47(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 25938351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the accuracy of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor grading with deep learning.
Govind D; Jen KY; Matsukuma K; Gao G; Olson KA; Gui D; Wilding GE; Border SP; Sarder P
Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11064. PubMed ID: 32632119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paradoxical results obtained with Ki67-labeling and PHH3-mitosis index in glial tumors: a literature analysis.
Elmaci İ; Altinoz MA; Bolukbasi FH; Yapicier O; Sav A
Clin Neuropathol; 2017; 36(6):272-282. PubMed ID: 28853695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical validation of the gastrointestinal NET grading system: Ki67 index criteria of the WHO 2010 classification is appropriate to predict metastasis or recurrence.
Yamaguchi T; Fujimori T; Tomita S; Ichikawa K; Mitomi H; Ohno K; Shida Y; Kato H
Diagn Pathol; 2013 Apr; 8():65. PubMed ID: 23607525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Tissue heterogeneity contributes to suboptimal precision of WHO 2010 scoring criteria for Ki67 labeling index in a subset of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas].
Liszka Ł
Pol J Pathol; 2016; 67(4):318-331. PubMed ID: 28547959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
