174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31764564)
1. Comparison of Endoscope-Assisted Coblation Adenoidectomy to Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy in Terms of Postoperative Eustachian Tube Function.
Gülşen S; Çikrikçi S
J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 31(4):919-923. PubMed ID: 31764564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between curettage adenoidectomy and endoscopic-assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy in terms of Eustachian tube dysfunction.
Atilla MH; Kaytez SK; Kesici GG; Baştimur S; Tuncer S
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30322828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy.
Bidaye R; Vaid N; Desarda K
J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):294-299. PubMed ID: 30885281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two different adenoidectomy techniques with special emphasize on postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates: coblation technique vs. cold curettage.
Özkiriş M; Karaçavuş S; Kapusuz Z; Saydam L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 77(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 23266160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of middle ear pressure in the early period after adenoidectomy in children with adenoid hypertrophy without otitis media with effusion.
Unlu I; Unlu EN; Kesici GG; Guclu E; Yaman H; Ilhan E; Ulucanlı S; Karadeniz D; Memis M
Am J Otolaryngol; 2015; 36(3):377-81. PubMed ID: 25766622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trans-oral endoscopic assisted radio-frequency for adenoid ablation; A randomized prospective comparative clinical study.
Elzayat S; Elsherif H; Aouf M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Aug; 48(4):710-717. PubMed ID: 33261981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of classical, coblation, and combined adenoidectomy techniques in paediatric patients: a single-blind, prospective study.
Alaskarov E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3735-3741. PubMed ID: 38581574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy.
Yanılmaz M; Akduman D
Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(4):103807. PubMed ID: 36906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy to curettage adenoidectomy.
Öztürk Ö; Polat Ş
Adv Ther; 2012 Aug; 29(8):708-21. PubMed ID: 22864943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different techniques of adenoidectomy and its impact on middle ear pressure: a randomized controlled study.
Seleim AM; Elsamnody AN; Amer AF
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 281(1):379-385. PubMed ID: 37930385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The effect of adenoidectomy in different operative methods on the function of eustachian tube].
Li Y; Li P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 26(10):466-7. PubMed ID: 22870722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy - a randomised controlled trial.
Juneja R; Meher R; Raj A; Rathore P; Wadhwa V; Arora N
J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):289-293. PubMed ID: 31046870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paediatric adenoidectomy: endoscopic coblation technique compared to cold curettage.
Di Rienzo Businco L; Angelone AM; Mattei A; Ventura L; Lauriello M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2012 Apr; 32(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 22767975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pediatric Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Study Between Cold Curettage and Coblation Technique.
Hapalia VB; Panchal AJ; Kumar R; Kapadia PB; Bhiryani MA; Verma RB; Parmar ND
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 74(Suppl 2):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 36452765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coblation versus microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy.
Mularczyk C; Walner DL; Hamming KK
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():29-31. PubMed ID: 29287875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.
Pagella F; Matti E; Colombo A; Giourgos G; Mira E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 18720070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three different adenoidectomy techniques in children - has the conventional technique been surpassed?
Ferreira MS; Mangussi-Gomes J; Ximendes R; Evangelista AR; Miranda EL; Garcia LB; Stamm AC
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():145-149. PubMed ID: 29287856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Certain effects of adenoidectomy of Eustachian tube ventilatory function.
Bluestone CD; Cantekin EI; Beery QC
Laryngoscope; 1975 Jan; 85(1):113-27. PubMed ID: 1089852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study.
Tulaci KG; Arslan E; Tulaci T; Dinek A; Yazici H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 278(3):797-805. PubMed ID: 32989492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Malas M; Althobaiti AA; Sindi A; Bukhari AF; Zawawi F
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Mar; 52(1):21. PubMed ID: 36870974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
