146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31764743)
21. Ethics versus education: pelvic exams on anesthetized women.
Schniederjan S; Donovan GK
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2005 Aug; 98(8):386-8. PubMed ID: 16206868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pelvic examinations under anesthesia: a teachable moment.
York-Best CM; Ecker JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):741-2. PubMed ID: 22996088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Consent requirements for pelvic examinations performed for training purposes.
Gibson E; Downie J
CMAJ; 2012 Jul; 184(10):1159-61. PubMed ID: 22451693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Pelvic examination instruction and experience: a comparison of laywoman-trained and physician-trained students.
Kleinman DE; Hage ML; Hoole AJ; Kowlowitz V
Acad Med; 1996 Nov; 71(11):1239-43. PubMed ID: 9217513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcomes of teaching medical students core skills for women's health: the pelvic examination educational program.
Carr SE; Carmody D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1382-7. PubMed ID: 15167845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Teaching pelvic examinations under anaesthesia: what do women think?
Wainberg S; Wrigley H; Fair J; Ross S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Jan; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 20370981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pelvic examinations under anesthesia: an important teaching tool.
Goedken J
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 16471020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Can physicians be replaced with gynecological teaching women to train medical students in their first pelvic examination? A pilot study from Northern Sweden.
Grankvist O; Olofsson AD; Isaksson RM
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Jul; 96(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 24854066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Written consent for intimate examinations undertaken by medical students in the operating theatre--time for national guidelines?
Martyn F; O'Connor R
Ir Med J; 2009; 102(10):336-7. PubMed ID: 20108806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effective analysis of teaching pelvic examination skills using Gynaecology Teaching Associates (GTAs) compared with manikin models (The CEAT Study).
Janjua A; Roberts T; Okeahialam N; Clark TJ
BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e015823. PubMed ID: 29934378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intersecting gender, evaluations, and examinations: Averting gender bias in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship in the United States.
Jacques L; Kaljo K; Treat R; Davis J; Farez R; Lund M
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2016; 29(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 26996795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical students' perceptions of the physician's role in not allowing them to perform gynecological examinations.
van den Einden LC; te Kolste MG; Lagro-Janssen AL; Dukel L
Acad Med; 2014 Jan; 89(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24280852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Framing patient consent for student involvement in pelvic examination: a dual model of autonomy.
Carson-Stevens A; Davies MM; Jones R; Chik AD; Robbé IJ; Fiander AN
J Med Ethics; 2013 Nov; 39(11):676-80. PubMed ID: 23322682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The essential elements of undergraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynecology: a comparison of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Medical Student Educational Objectives and the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination.
Hammoud MM; Cox SM; Goff B; Goepfert A; Butler A; Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Katz NT; Erickson SS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 193(5):1773-9. PubMed ID: 16260232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical student evaluation of teaching quality between obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty as clinical preceptors in ambulatory gynecology.
Johnson NR; Chen J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1479-83. PubMed ID: 16875655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Medical students' experiences in learning to perform pelvic examinations: a mixed-methods study.
Danielsson J; Hadding C; Fahlström M; Ottander U; Lindquist D
Int J Med Educ; 2021 Nov; 12():233-242. PubMed ID: 34842177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In Reply.
Hammoud MM; Spector-Bagdady K; O'Reilly M; Major C; Baecher-Lind L
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 135(4):973. PubMed ID: 32217958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. To the point: gender differences in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
Craig LB; Buery-Joyner SD; Bliss S; Everett EN; Forstein DA; Graziano SC; Hampton BS; McKenzie ML; Morgan H; Page-Ramsey SM; Pradhan A; Hopkins L;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):430-435. PubMed ID: 29852154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. To the Point: optimizing the learning environment in labor and delivery.
Schaffir J; Morgan HK; Bhargava R; Baecher-Lind L; Chen KT; Fleming A; Morosky C; Royce CS; Sims SM; Sonn T; Stephenson-Famy A; Sutton JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Sep; 5(9):101090. PubMed ID: 37437693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Integration of ultrasound simulation to improve medical student knowledge and satisfaction on the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
Shanks A; Darwish A; Cook M; Asencio I; Rouse C
AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 Aug; 3(3):100228. PubMed ID: 37645647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
