These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31765030)

  • 1. Effectiveness of nCPAP for moderate preterm infants compared to BiPAP: A Randomized, Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Lee MJ; Choi EK; Park KH; Shin J; Choi BM
    Pediatr Int; 2020 Jan; 62(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 31765030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as an Initial Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: a Randomized, Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Shin J; Park K; Lee EH; Choi BM
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(4):650-655. PubMed ID: 28244292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three different noninvasive ventilation strategies as initial respiratory support in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective study.
    Buyuktiryaki M; Okur N; Sari FN; Ozer Bekmez B; Bezirganoglu H; Cakir U; Dizdar EA; Oguz SS
    Arch Pediatr; 2020 Aug; 27(6):322-327. PubMed ID: 32651144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Murki S; Singh J; Khant C; Kumar Dash S; Oleti TP; Joy P; Kabra NS
    Neonatology; 2018; 113(3):235-241. PubMed ID: 29393237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of three kinds of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial].
    Gao X; Yang B; Hei M; Cui X; Wang J; Zhou G; Qu S
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 52(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 24680406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Zhu XW; Shi Y; Shi LP; Liu L; Xue J; Ramanathan R;
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 29898763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postextubation Noninvasive Ventilation in Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    El-Farrash RA; DiBlasi RM; AbdEL-Aziz EA; El-Tahry AM; Eladawy MS; Tadros MA; Koriesh MA; Farid JV; AbdElwahab RS; Elsayed MA; Barakat NM
    Am J Perinatol; 2022 Oct; 29(14):1577-1585. PubMed ID: 33621983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Preterm Infants with Moderate Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X; Feng Z; Liu C; Shi L; Shi Y; Ramanathan R;
    Neonatology; 2021; 118(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 33827081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical effect of bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure in respiratory support for preterm infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].
    Shu XX; Chen C; Tang J; Wang H
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 20(6):433-437. PubMed ID: 29972114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. N-BiPAP vs n-CPAP in term neonate with respiratory distress syndrome.
    Cimino C; Saporito MAN; Vitaliti G; Pavone P; Mauceri L; Gitto E; Corsello G; Lubrano R; Falsaperla R
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Mar; 142():104965. PubMed ID: 32044607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three non-invasive ventilation strategies (NSIPPV/BiPAP/NCPAP) for RDS in VLBW infants.
    Salvo V; Lista G; Lupo E; Ricotti A; Zimmermann LJI; Gavilanes AWD; Gitto E; Colivicchi M; Ferraù V; Gazzolo D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Nov; 31(21):2832-2838. PubMed ID: 28718356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
    Malakian A; Bashirnezhadkhabaz S; Aramesh MR; Dehdashtian M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Aug; 33(15):2601-2607. PubMed ID: 30513030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative study on application of Duo positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome].
    Kong LK; Kong XY; Li LH; Dong JY; Shang MX; Chi JH; Huang RX; Zheng Y; Ma JE; Chen XC; Wang Y; Cai N; Feng ZC
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 14(12):888-92. PubMed ID: 23234771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive duo positive airway pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
    Malakian A; Aramesh MR; Agahin M; Dehdashtian M
    BMC Pediatr; 2021 Jul; 21(1):301. PubMed ID: 34229655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary respiratory support strategies for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li J; Chen L; Shi Y
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):215-223. PubMed ID: 34254173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date.
    Li W; Long C; Zhangxue H; Jinning Z; Shifang T; Juan M; Renjun L; Yuan S
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2015 Apr; 50(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 25418007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG; Kirpalani H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD003212. PubMed ID: 25188554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bi-level Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for Preterm Infants with Birth Weight Less Than 1500 g and Respiratory Distress Syndrome Following INSURE Treatment: A Two-center Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Pan R; Chen GY; Wang J; Zhou ZX; Zhang PY; Chang LW; Rong ZH
    Curr Med Sci; 2021 Jun; 41(3):542-547. PubMed ID: 34129204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the duration of non-invasive respiratory support in late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial.
    Baldan E; Varal IG; Dogan P; Cizmeci MN
    Eur J Pediatr; 2023 Oct; 182(10):4499-4507. PubMed ID: 37491619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bi-Level Noninvasive Ventilation in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Solevåg AL; Cheung PY; Schmölzer GM
    Neonatology; 2021; 118(3):264-273. PubMed ID: 33756488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.