BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31765602)

  • 1. Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object-Scene Information.
    Coco MI; Nuthmann A; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):571-589. PubMed ID: 31765602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of scene and object orientation on the scene consistency effect.
    Lauer T; Willenbockel V; Maffongelli L; Võ ML
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Sep; 394():112812. PubMed ID: 32682913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic Scene-Object Consistency Modulates N300/400 EEG Components, but Does Not Automatically Facilitate Object Representations.
    Chen L; Cichy RM; Kaiser D
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Aug; 32(16):3553-3567. PubMed ID: 34891169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parafoveal and foveal N400 effects in natural reading: A timeline of semantic processing from fixation-related potentials.
    Li N; Wang S; Kornrumpf F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2024 May; 61(5):e14524. PubMed ID: 38297818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior.
    Cornelissen TH; Võ ML
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):154-168. PubMed ID: 27645215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No evidence from MVPA for different processes underlying the N300 and N400 incongruity effects in object-scene processing.
    Draschkow D; Heikel E; Võ ML; Fiebach CJ; Sassenhagen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():9-17. PubMed ID: 30261162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of scene summary statistics in object recognition.
    Lauer T; Cornelissen THW; Draschkow D; Willenbockel V; Võ ML
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):14666. PubMed ID: 30279431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics.
    Nuthmann A; de Groot F; Huettig F; Olivers CNL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217051. PubMed ID: 31120948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of semantic consistency and perceptual features on visual attention during scene viewing in toddlers.
    Helo A; van Ommen S; Pannasch S; Danteny-Dordoigne L; Rämä P
    Infant Behav Dev; 2017 Nov; 49():248-266. PubMed ID: 29028583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing.
    Demiral SB; Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1271-85. PubMed ID: 22391475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain.
    Kiat JE; Hayes TR; Henderson JM; Luck SJ
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 34750229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extra-foveal Processing of Object Semantics Guides Early Overt Attention During Visual Search.
    Cimminella F; Sala SD; Coco MI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):655-670. PubMed ID: 31792893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects.
    Dyck M; Brodeur MB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jun; 72():43-51. PubMed ID: 25911127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the Semantic-Inconsistency Effect in Scenes Using a Continuous Measure of Linguistic-Semantic Similarity.
    Damiano C; Leemans M; Wagemans J
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Jun; 35(6):623-634. PubMed ID: 38652604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic Relations between Visual Objects Can Be Unconsciously Processed but Not Reported under Change Blindness.
    Ball F; Bernasconi F; Busch NA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2253-68. PubMed ID: 26244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing.
    Bonitz VS; Gordon RD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 18804752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.
    Wu CC; Wang HC; Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():10-20. PubMed ID: 25199610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The elephant in the room: Inconsistency in scene viewing and representation.
    Spotorno S; Tatler BW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1717-1743. PubMed ID: 28967780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.