These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31765925)

  • 1. Distractor context manipulation in visual search: How expectations modulate proactive control.
    Petilli MA; Marini F; Daini R
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104129. PubMed ID: 31765925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A feature and conjunction visual search immersive virtual reality serious game for measuring spatial and distractor inhibition attention using response time and action kinematics.
    Ajana K; Everard G; Lejeune T; Edwards MG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2023 May; 45(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 37260369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of context-dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks.
    Reavis EA; Frank SM; Greenlee MW; Tse PU
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jun; 37(6):2319-30. PubMed ID: 26970441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches.
    Lawrence RK; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 34907511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search.
    Poisson ME; Wilkinson F
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 1528701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.
    Lamy D; Tsal Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Mar; 6(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 12199317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the role of top-down and bottom-up guidance in conjunction search: Singleton interference revisited.
    Dent K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1784-1810. PubMed ID: 37017865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture.
    Moher J; Abrams J; Egeth HE; Yantis S; Stuphorn V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 21691926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural mechanisms underlying distractor inhibition on the basis of feature and/or spatial expectations.
    van Moorselaar D; Daneshtalab N; Slagter HA
    Cortex; 2021 Apr; 137():232-250. PubMed ID: 33640854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down control of attention under varying task loads.
    Jo S; Kim JY; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 May; 216():103310. PubMed ID: 33892264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the role of spatial filtering on distractor suppression.
    Mohite V; Prasad S; Mishra RK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38148431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search.
    Bichot NP; Schall JD
    Vis Neurosci; 1999; 16(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 10022480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
    Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.