These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31765925)

  • 21. The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection.
    Mast F; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2198-213. PubMed ID: 25328998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.
    Matsuda S; Matsumoto H; Furubayashi T; Fukuda H; Emoto M; Hanajima R; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y; Terao Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116181. PubMed ID: 25545148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Williams LH; Drew T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 33000442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impaired top-down control of visual search in schizophrenia.
    Gold JM; Fuller RL; Robinson BM; Braun EL; Luck SJ
    Schizophr Res; 2007 Aug; 94(1-3):148-55. PubMed ID: 17544632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of prevalence on distractor speeded search termination.
    Lui L; Pratt J; Lawrence RK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):303-311. PubMed ID: 37580452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Top-down knowledge modulates onset capture in a feedforward manner.
    Becker SI; Lewis AJ; Axtens JE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):436-446. PubMed ID: 27535753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search.
    Bacon WJ; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Aug; 23(4):948-61. PubMed ID: 9269723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks.
    Lee J; Shomstein S
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Feb; 25(2):466-75. PubMed ID: 24335604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Top-down inhibition of search distractors in parallel visual search.
    Müller HJ; von Mühlenen A; Geyer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1373-88. PubMed ID: 18078228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Guidance of eye movements during conjunctive visual search: the distractor-ratio effect.
    Shen J; Reingold EM; Pomplun M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 57(2):76-96. PubMed ID: 12822838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
    Kerzel D; Barras C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?
    Lamy D; Tsal Y; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):621-9. PubMed ID: 14620356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.
    Wen W; Zhang Y; Li S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2430-2440. PubMed ID: 33904153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two mechanisms of distractor dilution: visual selection in a continuous flow.
    Yeh YY; Lin SH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):872-92. PubMed ID: 23106375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Causal Evidence for the Role of Neuronal Oscillations in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention.
    Riddle J; Hwang K; Cellier D; Dhanani S; D'Esposito M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 May; 31(5):768-779. PubMed ID: 30726180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.