255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31766603)
1. The Role of Health Literacy in Explaining the Relation between Educational Level and Decision Making about Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Woudstra AJ; Smets EMA; Verdam MGE; Fransen MP
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31766603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health literacy and informed decision making regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
van der Heide I; Uiters E; Jantine Schuit A; Rademakers J; Fransen M
Eur J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 25(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 25733553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of health literacy domains for informed decision making about colorectal cancer screening using classical test theory and item response theory.
Woudstra AJ; Smets EMA; Galenkamp H; Fransen MP
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Dec; 102(12):2335-2343. PubMed ID: 31561933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy.
Smith SK; Simpson JM; Trevena LJ; McCaffery KJ
Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):756-72. PubMed ID: 24421292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health literacy skills for informed decision making in colorectal cancer screening: Perceptions of screening invitees and experts.
Woudstra AJ; Timmermans DRM; Uiters E; Dekker E; Smets EMA; Fransen MP
Health Expect; 2018 Jun; 21(3):636-646. PubMed ID: 29266661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels.
Woudstra AJ; Smets EMA; Dekker E; Broens THF; Penning J; Smith S; McCaffery K; Fransen MP
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Oct; 102(10):1847-1858. PubMed ID: 31064682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening.
Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
BMC Psychol; 2020 Feb; 8(1):11. PubMed ID: 32014059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.
Douma LN; Uiters E; Verweij MF; Timmermans DRM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233308. PubMed ID: 32469889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analyzing paths from online health information seeking to colorectal cancer screening using health literacy skills frame and cognitive mediation model.
Jin SW; Lee Y; Dia DA
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Mar; 102(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 30448041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accessibility of standardized information of a national colorectal cancer screening program for low health literate screening invitees: A mixed method study.
Fransen MP; Dekker E; Timmermans DRM; Uiters E; Essink-Bot ML
Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Feb; 100(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 27613567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Gabel P; Larsen MB; Kirkegaard P; Edwards A; Andersen B
Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):543. PubMed ID: 30305114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Literacy and Awareness, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer and Its Screening in Riyadh Region.
Almutairi KM; Alonazi WB; Alodhayani A; Vinluan JM; Ahmad M; Alhurishi SA; Alsadhan N; Alsalem MM; Alotaibi NE; Alaqeel AM
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Jun; 33(3):660-667. PubMed ID: 27804030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy.
Essink-Bot ML; Dekker E; Timmermans DR; Uiters E; Fransen MP
Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2016; 2016():7292369. PubMed ID: 27200089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The LEAD trial-The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial.
Gabel P; Edwards A; Kirkegaard P; Larsen MB; Andersen B
Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Feb; 103(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 31451360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decisional balance and self-efficacy mediate the association among provider advice, health literacy and cervical cancer screening.
Kim K; Xue QL; Walton-Moss B; Nolan MT; Han HR
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2018 Feb; 32():55-62. PubMed ID: 29353633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing knowledge and attitudes towards screening among users of Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT).
Denters MJ; Deutekom M; Essink-Bot ML; Bossuyt PM; Fockens P; Dekker E
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):839-49. PubMed ID: 23432931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?
Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0213003. PubMed ID: 30817788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys.
Wong MC; John GK; Hirai HW; Lam TY; Luk AK; Ching JY; Ng SS; Chan FK; Griffiths SM; Sung JJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1541-8. PubMed ID: 22836914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Questionnaire Validation of Colorectal Cancer Literacy Scale among Thai People in Northeastern Thailand.
Kawthaisong C; Promthet S; Kamsa-Ard S; Duangsong R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):645-651. PubMed ID: 30806072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The associations between objective numeracy and colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and defensive processing in a deprived community sample.
Smith SG; Kobayashi LC; Wolf MS; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
J Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 21(8):1665-75. PubMed ID: 25512199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
