These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31766811)

  • 1. ESTIMABILITY OF DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN MODELS OF TIME SERIES DATA.
    Knape J
    Ecology; 2008 Nov; 89(11):2994-3000. PubMed ID: 31766811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data.
    Nicolau PG; Sørbye SH; Yoccoz NG
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):12710-12726. PubMed ID: 33304489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating population dynamics models and distance sampling data: a spatial hierarchical state-space approach.
    Nadeem K; Moore JE; Zhang Y; Chipman H
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1735-1745. PubMed ID: 27859153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for sampling error when inferring population synchrony from time-series data: a Bayesian state-space modelling approach with applications.
    Santin-Janin H; Hugueny B; Aubry P; Fouchet D; Gimenez O; Pontier D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87084. PubMed ID: 24489839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Census error and the detection of density dependence.
    Freckleton RP; Watkinson AR; Green RE; Sutherland WJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jul; 75(4):837-51. PubMed ID: 17009748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving inference for nonlinear state-space models of animal population dynamics given biased sequential life stage data.
    Polansky L; Newman KB; Mitchell L
    Biometrics; 2021 Mar; 77(1):352-361. PubMed ID: 32243577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On observation distributions for state space models of population survey data.
    Knape J; Jonzén N; Sköld M
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1269-77. PubMed ID: 21635251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using uncertainty estimates in analyses of population time series.
    Knape J; Besbeas P; de Valpine P
    Ecology; 2013 Sep; 94(9):2097-107. PubMed ID: 24279280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are patterns of density dependence in the Global Population Dynamics Database driven by uncertainty about population abundance?
    Knape J; de Valpine P
    Ecol Lett; 2012 Jan; 15(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 22017744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling observation error and its effects in a random walk/extinction model.
    Buonaccorsi JP; Staudenmayer J; Carreras M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 16580037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Density dependence and climate effects in Rocky Mountain elk: an application of regression with instrumental variables for population time series with sampling error.
    Creel S; Creel M
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian approach to identifying and compensating for model misspecification in population models.
    Thorson JT; Ono K; Munch SB
    Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):329-41. PubMed ID: 24669727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical modeling strengthens evidence for density dependence in observational time series of population dynamics.
    Thibaut LM; Connolly SR
    Ecology; 2020 Jan; 101(1):e02893. PubMed ID: 31529700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of spatial models for estimating the strength of density dependence.
    Thorson JT; Skaug HJ; Kristensen K; Shelton AO; Ward EJ; Harms JH; Benante JA
    Ecology; 2015 May; 96(5):1202-12. PubMed ID: 26236835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
    Marques TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting fluctuations of reintroduced ibex populations: the importance of density dependence, environmental stochasticity and uncertain population estimates.
    Saether BE; Lillegård M; Grøtan V; Filli F; Engen S
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Mar; 76(2):326-36. PubMed ID: 17302840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segmented regression with errors in predictors: semi-parametric and parametric methods.
    Küchenhoff H; Carroll RJ
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):169-88. PubMed ID: 9004390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating known sources of uncertainty to determine precautionary harvests of saltwater crocodiles.
    Bradshaw CJ; Fukuda Y; Letnic M; Brook BW
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Aug; 16(4):1436-48. PubMed ID: 16937809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the variance estimation methods for heteroscedastic nonlinear models.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(26):4856-4874. PubMed ID: 27383279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.