These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31766891)

  • 1. Evaluation of non-commercial models for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in the assessment of EFSA's databases.
    Carnesecchi E; Raitano G; Gamba A; Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2020 Jan; 31(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 31766891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. (Q)SAR Methods for Predicting Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity: Scientific Rationale and Regulatory Frameworks.
    Bossa C; Benigni R; Tcheremenskaia O; Battistelli CL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():447-473. PubMed ID: 29934905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decision tree-based integrated testing strategy for tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test substances using genotoxicity test results and chemical spaces.
    Fujita Y; Honda H; Yamane M; Morita T; Matsuda T; Morita O
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30551173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EFSA's OpenFoodTox: An open source toxicological database on chemicals in food and feed and its future developments.
    Dorne JLCM; Richardson J; Livaniou A; Carnesecchi E; Ceriani L; Baldin R; Kovarich S; Pavan M; Saouter E; Biganzoli F; Pasinato L; Zare Jeddi M; Robinson TP; Kass GEN; Liem AKD; Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Yang C; Tarkhov A; Georgiadis N; Di Nicola MR; Mostrag A; Verhagen H; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E; Bassan A
    Environ Int; 2021 Jan; 146():106293. PubMed ID: 33395940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotoxicity testing approaches for the safety assessment of substances used in food contact materials prior to their authorization in the European Union.
    Bolognesi C; Castoldi AF; Crebelli R; Barthélémy E; Maurici D; Wölfle D; Volk K; Castle L
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):361-374. PubMed ID: 28556235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the performance of TIMES genotoxicity models with EFSA pesticide data.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Honma M; Yamada T; Kaloyanova E; Mekenyan OG
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 30445516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a statistics-based Ames mutagenicity QSAR model and interpretation of the results obtained.
    Barber C; Cayley A; Hanser T; Harding A; Heghes C; Vessey JD; Werner S; Weiner SK; Wichard J; Giddings A; Glowienke S; Parenty A; Brigo A; Spirkl HP; Amberg A; Kemper R; Greene N
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():7-20. PubMed ID: 26708083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of in silico models for prioritization of heat-induced food contaminants in mutagenicity and carcinogenicity testing.
    Frenzel F; Buhrke T; Wenzel I; Andrack J; Hielscher J; Lampen A
    Arch Toxicol; 2017 Sep; 91(9):3157-3174. PubMed ID: 28091709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.
    Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 854-855():503199. PubMed ID: 32660827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In silico prediction of chromosome damage: comparison of three (Q)SAR models.
    Morita T; Shigeta Y; Kawamura T; Fujita Y; Honda H; Honma M
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 30085209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.
    Golbamaki A; Benfenati E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():107-19. PubMed ID: 27311464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across: An EFSA funded project.
    Benigni R; Serafimova R; Parra Morte JM; Battistelli CL; Bossa C; Giuliani A; Fioravanzo E; Bassan A; Gatnik MF; Rathman J; Yang C; Mostrag-Szlichtyng A; Sacher O; Tcheremenskaia O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Jul; 114():104658. PubMed ID: 32334037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of in-house and off-the-shelf in silico models: implications on guidance for mutagenicity assessment.
    Jolly R; Ahmed KB; Zwickl C; Watson I; Gombar V
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 71(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 25656493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Silico Prediction of Chemically Induced Mutagenicity: How to Use QSAR Models and Interpret Their Results.
    Mombelli E; Raitano G; Benfenati E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():87-105. PubMed ID: 27311463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of improved QSAR models for predicting the outcome of the in vivo micronucleus genetic toxicity assay.
    Yoo JW; Kruhlak NL; Landry C; Cross KP; Sedykh A; Stavitskaya L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Jun; 113():104620. PubMed ID: 32092371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.
    Golbamaki A; Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():201-215. PubMed ID: 35188634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lack of genotoxicity in vivo for food color additive Tartrazine.
    Bastaki M; Farrell T; Bhusari S; Pant K; Kulkarni R
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 105():278-284. PubMed ID: 28454783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data-based review of QSARs for predicting genotoxicity: the state of the art.
    Benigni R; Bossa C
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 30260416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.