These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31767202)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of denture base adaptation performance between pour and other conventional fabrication techniques.
    Akaltan F; Batak B; Oguz EI; Orhan K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):183.e1-183.e5. PubMed ID: 31767202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of palatal adaptation in acrylic resin denture bases using conventional and anchored polymerization techniques.
    Laughlin GA; Eick JD; Glaros AG; Young L; Moore DJ
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Dec; 10(4):204-11. PubMed ID: 11781968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Denture Base Adaptation Fabricated Using Conventional, Subtractive, and Additive Technologies: A Volumetric Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis.
    Oğuz Eİ; Kılıçarslan MA; Özcan M; Ocak M; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 33415779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Palatal vault depth influence on the flexural strength of two heat cure acrylic denture base resins: an in vitro study.
    Reddy BM; Himabindu M; Padmaja BI; Sunil M; Reddy NR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1131-6. PubMed ID: 24858763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques.
    Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 27112416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
    Tosun ON; Bilmenoglu C; Özdemir AK
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by Conventional, Milling, and 3-D Printing Techniques: An
    Masri G; Mortada R; Ounsi H; Alharbi N; Boulos P; Salameh Z
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):367-371. PubMed ID: 32584270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional stability of record bases fabricated from light-polymerized composite using two methods.
    Boberick KG; McCool J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 9576313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a new tension system, used in acrylic resin flasking, on the dimensional stability of denture bases.
    Consani RL; Domitti SS; Consani S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 12426498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the trueness of 3D printing and conventional casting for the fabrication of removable partial denture metal frameworks for patients with different palatal vault depths: An in vitro study.
    Boontherawara P; Chaijareenont P; Angkasith P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38845279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional processing deformation of three denture base materials.
    Artopoulos A; Juszczyk AS; Rodriguez JM; Clark RK; Radford DR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 24189112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of labial frenum notch size and palatal vault depth on stress concentration in a maxillary complete denture: a finite element study.
    Nejatidanesh F; Peimannia E; Savabi O
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):59-66. PubMed ID: 19430627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Palatal Vault Depth on the Trueness of Metal Laser-Sintered and Cast Cobalt-Chromium Removable Partial Denture Frameworks.
    Hamed HAE; Hebeshi AM; Husseiny E
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):353-360. PubMed ID: 35751546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology.
    McLaughlin JB; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):428-435. PubMed ID: 29136309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An In Vitro Study of Intaglio Surface, Periphery/Palatal Seal Area, and Primary Bearing Area Adaptation of 3D-Printed Denture Base Manufactured in Various Build Angles.
    Charoenphol K; Peampring C
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():3824894. PubMed ID: 36440094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of simulated microwave disinfection on complete denture base adaptation using different flask closure methods.
    Consani RL; Mesquita MF; de Arruda Nobilo MA; Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17394916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
    Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of digital surface displacements of maxillary dentures based on noninvasive anatomic landmarks.
    Norvell NG; Korioth TV; Cagna DR; Versluis A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 29429839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.