These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3176743)

  • 21. A comparison of the delta copper T and the copper T 200 in Bologna, Italy.
    Melega C; Biscontin S; Canedi L; Marchesini FP; Tirelli S; Bartolotti T; Flamigni C
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1986; 17(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 3727892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Florida's experience with an intrauterine device for the nulliparous patients.
    Caraway AF
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Sep; 15(3):114-6. PubMed ID: 1214252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experience with the Copper-7 and Copper-T intrauterine devices at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand.
    Koetsawang S; Srisupandit S; Bhiraleus P; Rachawat D; Kiriwat O; Jirochkul V; Mitra M; Thomas M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1982 Jan; 65(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 6153035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Analysis of minor complications in copper IUD wearers].
    Albert A; Carrasco F; Duenas JL; Navarro J
    Clin Invest Ginecol Obstet; 1983; 10(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 12265936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial].
    Zhang LJ; Weng LJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Aug; 29(8):481-3, 511. PubMed ID: 7835121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device: 5-year evaluation.
    Sellors JW
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 7326653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of combined multiload copper IUD (MLCu250 and MLCu375).
    Van Os WA; De Nooyer CC; Bakker S; Bomert L; Rhemrev PE; Loendersloot EW
    Int J Fertil; 1978; 23(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 30726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative evaluation of M.L. Cu. 250].
    van Os WA; Haspels AA; Rhemrev PE; Loendersloot EW; Lo Sin Sjoe E; de Nooyer CC
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1977 Dec; 72(12):829-32. PubMed ID: 607377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Use of intrauterine device by nulliparous women. Prospective study and preliminary data].
    Bastianelli C; Farris M; Lippa A; Lucantoni V; Valente A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1998 Jun; 50(6):231-3. PubMed ID: 9763814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Application of intrauterine devices preceded by measurement of the endometrial cavity using a Hollister sound].
    Reynoso Ron L; Lozano Balderas M; Lara Ricalde R; Flores Velez A; Aznar Ramos R
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 Feb; 50(298):21-4. PubMed ID: 7129181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Assessment of the performance of a copper intrauterine device: MLCu 375].
    Audebert A; Emperaire JC; Larue-charlus S
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Jan; 13(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12266608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Intrauterine contraception with Copper-T and Gravigard. A follow-up study from general practice].
    Hellebø R
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1979 Jan; 99(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 760239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A three to four year follow-up study of the intrauterine device in Ceylon.
    Visuvaratnam T
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1973 May; 76(5):115-8. PubMed ID: 4712295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An audit of intrauterine device usage and outcome in general practice.
    Presley AP
    Practitioner; 1980 Oct; 224(1348):1089-91. PubMed ID: 7220438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine device by laparoscopy.
    Demir SC; Cetin MT; Ucünsak IF; Atay Y; Toksöz L; Kadayifçi O
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 12041860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical experience with intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) inserted with and without tail.
    Batár I; Lampé LG; Allonen H
    Acta Chir Hung; 1988; 29(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 3239338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparative study of the intrauterine devices TCu 380 Ag and the Multiload Cu 375 in Panama].
    Moreno Arosemena JM; Holder G; Agámez A; López Sam J
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Apr; 52(324):99-103. PubMed ID: 6489798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The acceptability of the Copper 7, Multiload 250 and Copper T 220C intrauterine devices.
    Hutapea H; Mccarthy T; Goh TH; Hanafiah MJ; Simadjuntak P; Lim LS; Karim SM; Ratnam SS; Yong YM; Sinnathuray TA
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1984 Jan; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12312739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Multiload CU 250 IUD: a 10-year experience].
    Batár I
    Orv Hetil; 1988 Oct; 129(42):2235-7. PubMed ID: 3186240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.