These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3176743)

  • 41. Interim insertion of the ML Cu 250 intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Vankets He Thiery M; Van Der Pas H; Delbeke L Van Os WA; Tauber PE; Dombrowicz N; Macdonald JS; Haspels AA; Drogenduk AC
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Apr; 1(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 12336242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of two IUDs: Multiload Cu 250 and Copper T 200.
    Ladehoff P; Hansen MK; Larsen S; Sorensen T; Westergaard JG
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1983 Jan; 4(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 12264721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Comparative study of the T delta IUD and the copper T 220 in Costa Rica].
    Aranda Meléndez C; Waszak CS; Colven CE
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1986 Jul; 54():164-7. PubMed ID: 3527876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Intrauterine devices in general practice: a prospective study of 300 insertions].
    Marret H; Golfier F; Vollerin F; Legoaziou MF; Raudrant D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Sep; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 12379830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Multiload CU250 in general practice.
    Gadsby R; Holden J
    Practitioner; 1988 Dec; 232(1460):1343, 1347. PubMed ID: 3256888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Experience with the Ypsilon (Soichet) intrauterine device.
    Yarkoni S; Sadovsky E
    Isr J Med Sci; 1978 Feb; 14(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 649355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [A comparative study of the efficacy, tolerance and side effects in using IUDs--the Copper T and Nova T--over a 3-year period].
    Nalbanski B
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(2):46-9. PubMed ID: 2400059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Bacteriological study of extracted IUCDs.
    Harun R; Nayar S; Thum Yin Lai
    Malays J Reprod Health; 1989 Dec; 7(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 12283073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Spontaneous intrauterine rupture of contraceptive Lippes loop].
    Krzaklewski S; Mazurek S; Reszczyński A
    Polim Med; 1976; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 1273008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Copper-silver T: The classic T resuscitated].
    Jarvela S; Allonen H
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Jan; 14(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 12341240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Preliminary report on the use of the combined multiload contraceptive intrauterine device (ML Cu-250).
    Sadovsky E; Yarkoni S
    Fertil Steril; 1978 Nov; 30(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 720641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Expulsion of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery.
    Ragab A; Hamed HO; Alsammani MA; Shalaby H; Nabeil H; Barakat R; Fetih AN
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 130(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 25975871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genital mycoplasma in intrauterine contraceptive device users.
    Gupta I; Sharma S; Ganguli NK; Devi PK
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1979 Jul; 22(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 544494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Expulsions in immediate postpartum insertions of Lippes Loop D and Copper T IUDs and their counterpart Delta devices--an epidemiological analysis.
    Chi IC; Wilkens L; Rogers S
    Contraception; 1985 Aug; 32(2):119-34. PubMed ID: 3907964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical performance of copper-T-200, multiload-250 and Nova-T: A comparative multicentre study.
    Fylling P
    Contraception; 1987 May; 35(5):439-46. PubMed ID: 3304827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Clinical studies of the use of Cu 7 and Cu T intrauterine devices].
    Monteforte C; Disparti P
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1979; 100(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 426440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative cytologic evaluation of device smears in women using CuT 200 devices & Lippes loop.
    Engineer AD; Misra JS; Tandon P
    Indian J Med Res; 1984 Jun; 79():766-71. PubMed ID: 6519700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Clinical study of a copper IUD, T Cu 200].
    Viollet MF; Cohen J; Merger R
    Gynecologie; 1975 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 1095434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Experience with the T-CU 200 and 300 intrauterine devices].
    Fugère P; Girard Y; Lemay M
    Union Med Can; 1976 Nov; 105(11):1717-20. PubMed ID: 982699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An evaluation of six new intrauterine devices.
    Boateng J; Chi IC; Jones DB
    Adv Contracept; 1994 Mar; 10(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 8030456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.