These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31767492)
21. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI. Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series. Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions. Padhani AR; Weinreb J; Rosenkrantz AB; Villeirs G; Turkbey B; Barentsz J Eur Urol; 2019 Mar; 75(3):385-396. PubMed ID: 29908876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer. Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard. Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study. Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Krelle M; Gavin D; Koschel S; Aluwihare K; Sutherland T; Skinner S; Brennan J; Wong LM; Louie-Johnsun M BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 30714285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 3: Targeted Biopsy. Venderink W; Bomers JG; Overduin CG; Padhani AR; de Lauw GR; Sedelaar MJ; Barentsz JO Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):481-490. PubMed ID: 31791623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Structured reporting in radiologic education - Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies. Garmer M; Karpienski J; Groenemeyer DH; Wagener B; Kamper L; Haage P Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210458. PubMed ID: 34914538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection. Ziayee F; Ullrich T; Blondin D; Irmer H; Arsov C; Antoch G; Quentin M; Schimmöller L PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249532. PubMed ID: 33819295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prostate Indeterminate Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Biopsy Versus Surveillance: A Literature Review. Gómez Rivas J; Giganti F; Álvarez-Maestro M; Freire MJ; Kasivisvanathan V; Martinez-Piñeiro L; Emberton M Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):799-806. PubMed ID: 29525382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sathianathen NJ; Omer A; Harriss E; Davies L; Kasivisvanathan V; Punwani S; Moore CM; Kastner C; Barrett T; Van Den Bergh RC; Eddy BA; Gleeson F; Macpherson R; Bryant RJ; Catto JWF; Murphy DG; Hamdy FC; Ahmed HU; Lamb AD Eur Urol; 2020 Sep; 78(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 32444265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: Lights and shadows. Santoro AA; Di Gianfrancesco L; Racioppi M; Pinto F; Palermo G; Sacco E; Campetella M; Scarciglia E; Bientinesi R; Di Paola V; Totaro A Urologia; 2021 Nov; 88(4):280-286. PubMed ID: 34075837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The efficiency of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) using PI-RADS Version 2 in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Zhao C; Gao G; Fang D; Li F; Yang X; Wang H; He Q; Wang X Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(5):885-8. PubMed ID: 27179959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer. Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation: Diagnostic potential of a non-contrast-enhanced bi-parametric approach enhanced with relaxometry measurements. Arita Y; Akita H; Fujiwara H; Hashimoto M; Shigeta K; Kwee TC; Yoshida S; Kosaka T; Okuda S; Oya M; Jinzaki M Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100403. PubMed ID: 35242886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS): What the radiologists need to know? Razek AAKA; El-Diasty T; Elhendy A; Fahmy D; El-Adalany MA Clin Imaging; 2021 Nov; 79():183-200. PubMed ID: 34098371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure. Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]