BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31767543)

  • 1. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
    Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
    Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
    Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
    Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification.
    Marini N; Otálora S; Müller H; Atzori M
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102165. PubMed ID: 34303169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques.
    Melo PAS; Estivallet CLN; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Leite KRM
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e3198. PubMed ID: 34730614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.
    Yan C; Nakane K; Wang X; Fu Y; Lu H; Fan X; Feldman MD; Madabhushi A; Xu J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105528. PubMed ID: 32470903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Deep Learning Pipeline for Grade Groups Classification Using Digitized Prostate Biopsy Specimens.
    Hammouda K; Khalifa F; El-Melegy M; Ghazal M; Darwish HE; Abou El-Ghar M; El-Baz A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(20):. PubMed ID: 34695922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies using EfficientNet.
    Ramamurthy K; Varikuti AR; Gupta B; Aswani N
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2023 Apr; 68(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 36332194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning.
    Arvaniti E; Fricker KS; Moret M; Rupp N; Hermanns T; Fankhauser C; Wey N; Wild PJ; Rüschoff JH; Claassen M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12054. PubMed ID: 30104757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Deep Learning to Develop and Analyze Computational Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Prostate Core Biopsy Images for Tumor Diagnosis.
    Rana A; Lowe A; Lithgow M; Horback K; Janovitz T; Da Silva A; Tsai H; Shanmugam V; Bayat A; Shah P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205111. PubMed ID: 32432709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-Learning for Weakly Supervised Gleason Grading of Local Patterns.
    Silva-Rodriguez J; Colomer A; Dolz J; Naranjo V
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 33621184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.