These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31767543)

  • 1. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
    Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
    Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
    Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
    Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification.
    Marini N; Otálora S; Müller H; Atzori M
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102165. PubMed ID: 34303169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques.
    Melo PAS; Estivallet CLN; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Leite KRM
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e3198. PubMed ID: 34730614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.
    Yan C; Nakane K; Wang X; Fu Y; Lu H; Fan X; Feldman MD; Madabhushi A; Xu J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105528. PubMed ID: 32470903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Deep Learning Pipeline for Grade Groups Classification Using Digitized Prostate Biopsy Specimens.
    Hammouda K; Khalifa F; El-Melegy M; Ghazal M; Darwish HE; Abou El-Ghar M; El-Baz A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(20):. PubMed ID: 34695922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using multi-label ensemble CNN classifiers to mitigate labelling inconsistencies in patch-level Gleason grading.
    Butt MA; Kaleem MF; Bilal M; Hanif MS
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0304847. PubMed ID: 38968206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies using EfficientNet.
    Ramamurthy K; Varikuti AR; Gupta B; Aswani N
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2023 Apr; 68(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 36332194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning.
    Arvaniti E; Fricker KS; Moret M; Rupp N; Hermanns T; Fankhauser C; Wey N; Wild PJ; Rüschoff JH; Claassen M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12054. PubMed ID: 30104757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Deep Learning to Develop and Analyze Computational Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Prostate Core Biopsy Images for Tumor Diagnosis.
    Rana A; Lowe A; Lithgow M; Horback K; Janovitz T; Da Silva A; Tsai H; Shanmugam V; Bayat A; Shah P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205111. PubMed ID: 32432709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.