241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31767750)
21. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.
Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ
Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research.
George BJ; Beasley TM; Brown AW; Dawson J; Dimova R; Divers J; Goldsby TU; Heo M; Kaiser KA; Keith SW; Kim MY; Li P; Mehta T; Oakes JM; Skinner A; Stuart E; Allison DB
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2016 Apr; 24(4):781-90. PubMed ID: 27028280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?
Pawel S; Heyard R; Micheloud C; Held L
Elife; 2024 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 38739437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research.
Avidan MS; Ioannidis JPA; Mashour GA
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Apr; 122(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 30857597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.
Van Bavel JJ; Mende-Siedlecki P; Brady WJ; Reinero DA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(23):6454-9. PubMed ID: 27217556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bias in research.
Simundić AM
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2013; 23(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 23457761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Replication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychology.
Coyne JC
BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 27245324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
Marino MJ
Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science.
Moreau D; Corballis MC
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
Mullane K; Williams M
Biochem Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 138():7-18. PubMed ID: 28396196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.
Etz A; Vandekerckhove J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149794. PubMed ID: 26919473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preregistration in infant research-A primer.
Havron N; Bergmann C; Tsuji S
Infancy; 2020 Sep; 25(5):734-754. PubMed ID: 32857441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Metastudies for robust tests of theory.
Baribault B; Donkin C; Little DR; Trueblood JS; Oravecz Z; van Ravenzwaaij D; White CN; De Boeck P; Vandekerckhove J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(11):2607-2612. PubMed ID: 29531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Psychology, replication & beyond.
Laws KR
BMC Psychol; 2016 Jun; 4(1):30. PubMed ID: 27251381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science.
Patil P; Peng RD; Leek JT
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Jul; 11(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 27474140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.
Anderson SF; Maxwell SE
Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 28266872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies.
Cramer AO; van Ravenzwaaij D; Matzke D; Steingroever H; Wetzels R; Grasman RP; Waldorp LJ; Wagenmakers EJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):640-7. PubMed ID: 26374437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Correction for Bryan et al., Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Aug; 118(33):. PubMed ID: 34373337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A research primer, Part 2: Guidelines for developing a research project.
Yens DP; Brannan GD; Dumsha JZ
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Jan; 114(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 24384972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
