These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31767750)

  • 41. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
    Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports.
    Montori VM; Jaeschke R; Schünemann HJ; Bhandari M; Brozek JL; Devereaux PJ; Guyatt GH
    BMJ; 2004 Nov; 329(7474):1093-6. PubMed ID: 15528623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multi-Site Replications in Social Psychology: Reflections, Implications, and Future Directions.
    Baumeister RF; Bushman BJ; Tice DM
    Span J Psychol; 2023 Apr; 26():e3. PubMed ID: 37039076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What reproducibility crisis? New research protocol yields ultra-high replication rate.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2023 Nov; 623(7987):467-468. PubMed ID: 37945705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.
    Nosek BA; Hardwicke TE; Moshontz H; Allard A; Corker KS; Dreber A; Fidler F; Hilgard J; Kline Struhl M; Nuijten MB; Rohrer JM; Romero F; Scheel AM; Scherer LD; Schönbrodt FD; Vazire S
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():719-748. PubMed ID: 34665669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Misinterpreting p: The discrepancy between p values and the probability the null hypothesis is true, the influence of multiple testing, and implications for the replication crisis.
    Anderson SF
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):596-609. PubMed ID: 31829657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Special Editorial: Open science and the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry - next steps?
    Asarnow J; Bloch MH; Brandeis D; Alexandra Burt S; Fearon P; Fombonne E; Green J; Gregory A; Gunnar M; Halperin JM; Hollis C; Jaffee S; Klump K; Landau S; Lesch KP; Oldehinkel AJT; Peterson B; Ramchandani P; Sonuga-Barke E; Stringaris A; Zeanah CH
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2018 Jul; 59(7):826-827. PubMed ID: 29806217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):127-139. PubMed ID: 33617275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is replication possible without fidelity?
    Ellefson MR; Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1446-1455. PubMed ID: 35049324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research.
    Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Two years into the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative: reflections on conducting a large-scale replication of Brazilian biomedical science.
    Neves K; Carneiro CF; Wasilewska-Sampaio AP; Abreu M; Valério-Gomes B; Tan PB; Amaral OB
    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2020; 115():e200328. PubMed ID: 33111750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests.
    Killeen PR
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 15869691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science.
    Finkel EJ; Eastwick PW; Reis HT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Feb; 108(2):275-97. PubMed ID: 25603376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A reminder on millisecond timing accuracy and potential replication failure in computer-based psychology experiments: An open letter.
    Plant RR
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):408-11. PubMed ID: 25761394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Meta-analyzing the multiverse: A peek under the hood of selective reporting.
    Olsson-Collentine A; van Aert RCM; Bakker M; Wicherts J
    Psychol Methods; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37166859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Software for designing rigorous and replicable preclinical research: The Experimental Design Accelerator.
    Malin DH; Hetherington SA; Nghiem DM; Ward CP; Kelling N; Izygon JJ; Harrison-Walker LJ; Campbell JR; Hughes R; Buras WR
    J Neurosci Res; 2019 Sep; 97(9):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 31144358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.