These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31768041)

  • 1. Five ways China must cultivate research integrity.
    Tang L
    Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7784):589-591. PubMed ID: 31768041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Role of research institutions in management of scientific fraud: The example of Inserm Scientific Integrity delegation].
    Bungener M; Hadchouel M
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):841-6. PubMed ID: 22727982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud.
    Jia H
    Nat Med; 2006 Aug; 12(8):867. PubMed ID: 16892019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal defenses to the use of data digits to identify fabricated data.
    Walter C; Richards EP
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12012610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.
    Yong E; Ledford H; Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):454-7. PubMed ID: 24284713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Academic misconduct and detection.
    Wood BD
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 20051600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keeping a clean research environment: Addressing research misconduct and improving scientific integrity in China.
    Wang L; Liu Z
    Cancer Lett; 2019 Nov; 464():1-4. PubMed ID: 31430529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data falsification and question on academic integrity.
    Nurunnabi M; Hossain MA
    Account Res; 2019 Feb; 26(2):108-122. PubMed ID: 30595069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sanctions against fraudsters and the situation of whistleblowers with respect to the law].
    Moret-Bailly J
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):867-71. PubMed ID: 22771024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Scientific and Academic Integrity in Portugal: A National Enterprise].
    Massano J; Ferreira MA
    Acta Med Port; 2020 Jan; 33(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 31928597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
    Maisonneuve H
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.
    Horbach SPJM; Halffman W
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1461-1485. PubMed ID: 27995445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.
    Shaw D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1085-1093. PubMed ID: 29594670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fighting plagiarism.
    Lancet; 2008 Jun; 371(9631):2146. PubMed ID: 18586154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA.
    Reisig MD; Holtfreter K; Berzofsky ME
    Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):457-475. PubMed ID: 32438829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.