137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31768546)
1. Restabilization of the Occipitocervical Junction After a Complete Unilateral Condylectomy: A Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Fixation Techniques.
Eli IM; Karsy M; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Couldwell WT; Dailey AT; Mazur MD
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Aug; 19(2):157-164. PubMed ID: 31768546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study.
Vishteh AG; Crawford NR; Melton MS; Spetzler RF; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA
J Neurosurg; 1999 Jan; 90(1 Suppl):91-8. PubMed ID: 10413132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral joint-sparing condylectomy: implications for the far lateral approach revisited.
Kshettry VR; Healy AT; Colbrunn R; Beckler DT; Benzel EC; Recinos PF
J Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 127(4):829-836. PubMed ID: 27739941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of occipitocervical stability afforded by three fixation techniques.
Helgeson MD; Lehman RA; Sasso RC; Dmitriev AE; Mack AW; Riew KD
Spine J; 2011 Mar; 11(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 21377608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stabilization of the craniocervical junction after an internal dislocation injury: an in vitro study.
Radcliff KE; Hussain MM; Moldavsky M; Klocke NF; Vaccaro A; Albert TJ; Khalil S; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1070-6. PubMed ID: 25681231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Du JY; Aichmair A; Kueper J; Wright T; Lebl DR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Feb; 22(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 25478824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after anterior unilateral condylectomy: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base.
Perez-Orribo L; Little AS; Lefevre RD; Reyes PR; Newcomb AG; Prevedello DM; Roldan H; Nakaji P; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2013 Jun; 72(6):1021-29; discussion 1029-30. PubMed ID: 23442513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atlantoaxial fixation using C1 posterior arch screws: feasibility study, morphometric data, and biomechanical analysis.
Cadena G; Duong HT; Liu JJ; Kim KD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Dec; 30(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 30554179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Comparison of C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Short Pedicle Screw-C3 Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Construct Versus Goel-Harms Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability.
Lu Y; Lee YP; Bhatia NN; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):E393-E399. PubMed ID: 30234804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Novel Construct Incorporating C2 Unilateral Pedicle and Contralateral Translaminar Screws for Occipitocervical Internal Fixation: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study.
Huang J; Wang X; Nie Q; Zhang C; Wu H; Jian F
World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():e1166-e1173. PubMed ID: 33715837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Evaluation of Unilateral Versus Bilateral C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Intralaminar Fixation.
Bhatia N; Rama A; Sievers B; Quigley R; McGarry MH; Lee YP; Lee TQ
Global Spine J; 2017 May; 7(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 28660106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.
Takigawa T; Simon P; Espinoza Orías AA; Hong JT; Ito Y; Inoue N; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):E696-701. PubMed ID: 22158063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fatigue strength of C2 pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, and a hybrid construct in C1-C2 fixation.
Su BW; Shimer AL; Chinthakunta S; Salloum K; Ames CP; Vaccaro AR; Bucklen B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):E12-9. PubMed ID: 24108297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of crossed and parallel rod configurations in atlantoaxial internal fixation.
Qiu F; Zou XB; Xu XL; Jiang WC; Liu GC; Ma XY
Eur Spine J; 2021 Feb; 30(2):576-584. PubMed ID: 33180193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.
Melcher RP; Puttlitz CM; Kleinstueck FS; Lotz JC; Harms J; Bradford DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2435-40. PubMed ID: 12435971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique.
Uribe JS; Ramos E; Youssef AS; Levine N; Turner AW; Johnson WM; Vale FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):931-8. PubMed ID: 20375778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of five different occipito-atlanto-axial fixation techniques.
Oda I; Abumi K; Sell LC; Haggerty CJ; Cunningham BW; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(22):2377-82. PubMed ID: 10586464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical analysis of two C1-C2 fusion techniques.
Claybrooks R; Kayanja M; Milks R; Benzel E
Spine J; 2007; 7(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 17434809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
