234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31769529)
1. Characterization of Adnexal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging: A Pilot Study.
Delaney LJ; Machado P; Torkzaban M; Lyshchik A; Wessner CE; Kim C; Rosenblum N; Richard S; Wallace K; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 May; 39(5):977-985. PubMed ID: 31769529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subharmonic and Endoscopic Contrast Imaging of Pancreatic Masses: A Pilot Study.
Forsberg F; Stanczak M; Lyshchik A; Loren D; O'Kane P; Siddiqui A; Kowalski TE; Miller C; Fox T; Liu JB; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 28681437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with DCE-MRI in complex adnexal masses: A preliminary study.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Soualhi N; Balvay D; Darai E; Cuenod CA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 28370815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ADC-derived spatial features can accurately classify adnexal lesions.
Fathi Kazerooni A; Nabil M; Haghighat Khah H; Alviri M; Heidari-Sooreshjaani M; Gity M; Malek M; Saligheh Rad H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 28901638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Brewer M; Ranger-Moore J; Body G; Tranquart F
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Dec; 23(12):1629-39; quiz 1641-42. PubMed ID: 15557306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions with contrast-enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography.
Szymanski M; Socha MW; Kowalkowska ME; Zielińska IB; Eljaszewicz A; Szymanski W
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Nov; 131(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 26254725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parametric imaging using subharmonic signals from ultrasound contrast agents in patients with breast lesions.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Merton DA; Palazzo JP; Hall AL; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Jan; 30(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 21193708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound of adnexal masses.
Joshi M; Ganesan K; Munshi HN; Ganesan S; Lawande A
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2008 Apr; 29(2):72-97. PubMed ID: 18450134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses.
Cao L; Wei M; Liu Y; Fu J; Zhang H; Huang J; Pei X; Zhou J
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 33966893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perfusion estimation using contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging: an in vivo study.
Sridharan A; Eisenbrey JR; Liu JB; Machado P; Halldorsdottir VG; Dave JK; Zhao H; He Y; Park S; Dianis S; Wallace K; Thomenius KE; Forsberg F
Invest Radiol; 2013 Sep; 48(9):654-60. PubMed ID: 23695085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the examination of benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Ordén MR; Gudmundsson S; Kirkinen P
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Nov; 19(11):783-8. PubMed ID: 11065267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI): Quantitative and Semi-quantitative analysis at 3-Tesla MRI.
Gity M; Parviz S; Saligheh Rad H; Fathi Kazerooni A; Shirali E; Shakiba M; Baikpour M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Apr; 20(4):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 31030476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative laparoscopic sonography for improved preoperative sonographic pathologic characterization of adnexal masses.
Yang WT; Yuen PM; Ho SS; Leung TN; Metreweli C
J Ultrasound Med; 1998 Jan; 17(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 9440109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of 2- and 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced transvaginal sonography for diagnosis of small adnexal masses.
Hu R; Xiang H; Mu Y; Feng Y; Gu L; Liu H
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1889-99. PubMed ID: 25336475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; García Manero M
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 May; 24(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 15840800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging analysis of complex adnexal masses: a preliminary study.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Balvay D; Aubert E; Daraï E; Rouzier R; Cuenod CA; Bazot M
Eur Radiol; 2012 Apr; 22(4):738-45. PubMed ID: 22105841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
