196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31769736)
1. Clinical utility of pressure feedback to socket design and fabrication.
Armitage L; Buller A; Rajan G; Prusty G; Simmons A; Kark L
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Feb; 44(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 31769736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 2-generating person-specific candidate designs using multi-objective genetic algorithms.
Steer JW; Grudniewski PA; Browne M; Worsley PR; Sobey AJ; Dickinson AS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1347-1360. PubMed ID: 31741116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series.
Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Williams HE; Carey JP; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178517. PubMed ID: 28575012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a Custom Interface Pressure Measurement System to Improve Fitting of Transtibial Prosthetic Check Sockets.
Armitage L; Cho K; Sariyildiz E; Buller A; O'Brien S; Kark L
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring discomfort-An objective method for quantifying peak pressure discomfort and improved fit in adults with transtibial amputation.
Binedell T; Ghazali MFB; Wong C; Subburaj K; Blessing L
PM R; 2023 Apr; 15(4):482-492. PubMed ID: 35233956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transtibial prosthetic socket fitting: Australian prosthetist perspectives on primary challenges, management strategies, and opportunities for workflow and technological innovation.
Armitage L; McDonald KA; Kark L; Buller A; Ford B
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Apr; 47(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 36112475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the influence of cyclic loading on a laser sintered transtibial prosthetic socket using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).
Saey T; Muraru L; Raeve E; Cuppens K; Balcaen R; Creylman V
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5382-5385. PubMed ID: 31947072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal design and 3D printing of prosthetic socket based on the interface pressure between the socket and residual limb.
Tang J; Liu X; Liu Z; Li W
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Feb; 47(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 35511448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.
Brzostowski JT; Larsen BG; Youngblood RT; Ciol MA; Hafner BJ; Gurrey CJ; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30628522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advances in the measurement of prosthetic socket interface mechanics: a review of technology, techniques, and a 20-year update.
Young PR; Hebert JS; Marasco PD; Carey JP; Schofield JS
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2023; 20(9):729-739. PubMed ID: 37537898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a residuum/socket interface simulator for lower limb prosthetics.
McGrath MP; Gao J; Tang J; Laszczak P; Jiang L; Bader D; Moser D; Zahedi S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Mar; 231(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 28164748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets.
Sasaki K; Guerra G; Lei Phyu W; Chaisumritchoke S; Sutdet P; Kaewtip S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 35890905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Inductive Sensing System to Measure In-Socket Residual Limb Displacements for People Using Lower-Limb Prostheses.
Henrikson KM; Weathersby EJ; Larsen BG; Cagle JC; McLean JB; Sanders JE
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30423932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes.
Anderst W; Fiedler G; Onishi K; McKernan G; Gale T; Paulus P
Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):299. PubMed ID: 35413866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjustable-Volume Prosthetic Sockets: Market Overview and Value Propositions.
Klenow TD; Schulz J
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(2):35208. PubMed ID: 37615005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
