62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31769736)
21. Technologies of care and the engineering imaginary: Two approaches to assistive device design for the Global South.
Sigounas VY
Med Anthropol Q; 2024 Mar; 38(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 37824820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Business practices efficiency: Impact of integrating digital technology on clinical P&O practices.
Eshraghi A; Phillips C; Heim W
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Dec; 47(6):621-624. PubMed ID: 37395754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 3D Motion Analysis for the Assessment of Dynamic Coupling in Transtibial Prosthetics: A Proof of Concept.
Cullen S; Mackay R; Mohagheghi A; Du X
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol; 2023; 4():141-147. PubMed ID: 38274781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Use of Smartphone Photogrammetry to Digitise Transtibial Sockets: Optimisation of Method and Quantitative Evaluation of Suitability.
Cullen S; Mackay R; Mohagheghi A; Du X
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 34960503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Developing an Analogue Residual Limb for Comparative DVC Analysis of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Designs.
Rankin K; Steer J; Paton J; Mavrogordato M; Marter A; Worsley P; Browne M; Dickinson A
Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32906701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Advances in the measurement of prosthetic socket interface mechanics: a review of technology, techniques, and a 20-year update.
Young PR; Hebert JS; Marasco PD; Carey JP; Schofield JS
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2023; 20(9):729-739. PubMed ID: 37537898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 2-generating person-specific candidate designs using multi-objective genetic algorithms.
Steer JW; Grudniewski PA; Browne M; Worsley PR; Sobey AJ; Dickinson AS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1347-1360. PubMed ID: 31741116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series.
Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Williams HE; Carey JP; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178517. PubMed ID: 28575012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of a Custom Interface Pressure Measurement System to Improve Fitting of Transtibial Prosthetic Check Sockets.
Armitage L; Cho K; Sariyildiz E; Buller A; O'Brien S; Kark L
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical utility of pressure feedback to socket design and fabrication.
Armitage L; Buller A; Rajan G; Prusty G; Simmons A; Kark L
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Feb; 44(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 31769736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
