These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31769736)
41. Application of ultrasound to monitor in vivo residual bone movement within transtibial prosthetic sockets. Jonkergouw N; Prins MR; Donse D; van der Wurff P; van Dieën JH; Buis A; Houdijk H Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9725. PubMed ID: 38678076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of alignment changes on sagittal and coronal socket reaction moment interactions in transtibial prostheses. Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Zhang M; Boone DA J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1343-50. PubMed ID: 23499228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique. Fatone S; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Progress Toward Optimizing Prosthetic Socket Fit and Suspension Using Elevated Vacuum to Promote Residual Limb Health. Wernke MM; Schroeder RM; Haynes ML; Nolt LL; Albury AW; Colvin JM Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2017 Jul; 6(7):233-239. PubMed ID: 28736683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Scoping review to evaluate existing measurement parameters and clinical outcomes of transtibial prosthetic alignment and socket fit. Won NY; Paul A; Garibaldi M; Baumgartner RE; Kaufman KR; Reider L; Wrigley J; Morshed S Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 35412519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A new approach for the pistoning measurement in transtibial prosthesis. Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Lúvíksdóttir Á; Eshraghi A; Kamyab M; Wan Abas WA Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 21975850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. How do transtibial residual limbs adjust to intermittent incremental socket volume changes? Larsen BG; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Brzostowski JT; Garbini JL; Sanders JE Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):528-539. PubMed ID: 31339448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Impact of Limited Prosthetic Socket Documentation: A Researcher Perspective. Olsen J; Turner S; Chadwell A; Dickinson A; Ostler C; Armitage L; McGregor AH; Dupan S; Day S Front Rehabil Sci; 2022; 3():853414. PubMed ID: 36189046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses through visualization of socket reaction moments. Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Boone DA Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Dec; 39(6):512-6. PubMed ID: 25121726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A review of history of CAD/CAM system application in the production of transtibial prosthetic socket in developing countries (from 1980 to 2019). Afiqah Hamzah N; Razak NAA; Sayuti Ab Karim M; Gholizadeh H Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1359-1374. PubMed ID: 34304625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Finite element analysis of the contact interface between trans-femoral stump and prosthetic socket. Zhang L; Zhu M; Shen L; Zheng F Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1270-3. PubMed ID: 24109926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Parametric analysis using the finite element method to investigate prosthetic interface stresses for persons with trans-tibial amputation. Silver-Thorn MB; Childress DS J Rehabil Res Dev; 1996 Jul; 33(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 8823671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs--Part 2: Quantitative outcomes. Safari MR; Meier MR J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(5):509-26. PubMed ID: 26436733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Interface pressures in above-knee sockets. Krouskop TA; Brown J; Goode B; Winningham D Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Oct; 68(10):713-4. PubMed ID: 3662780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Modeling the mechanics of elevated vacuum systems in prosthetic sockets. Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Brzostowski JT; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE Med Eng Phys; 2020 Oct; 84():75-83. PubMed ID: 32977925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Strength testing of low-cost 3D-printed transtibial prosthetic socket. van der Stelt M; Verhamme L; Slump CH; Brouwers L; Maal TJ Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Mar; 236(3):367-375. PubMed ID: 34852701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment. Ontario Health (Quality) Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Structural testing of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: A systematic review. Gariboldi F; Pasquarelli D; Cutti AG Med Eng Phys; 2022 Jan; 99():103742. PubMed ID: 35058025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]