These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31770002)
1. Effect of a Japanese drug alert pictogram on medication-taking/driving behavior. Fukuda Y; Ando S; Saito M Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 31770002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How effective are pictograms in communicating risk about driving-impairing medicines? Monteiro SP; Huiskes R; Van Dijk L; Van Weert JC; De Gier JJ Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 23441949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Spanish pictogram on medicines and driving: The population's comprehension of and attitudes towards its use on medication packaging. Fierro I; Gómez-Talegón T; Alvarez FJ Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1056-61. PubMed ID: 22944189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital outpatients' responses to taking medications with driving warnings. Smyth T; Sheehan M; Siskind V Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 23259515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk awareness, medication adherence, and driving behavior as determined by the provision of drug information to patients. Fukuda Y; Ando S; Saito M Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Aug; 103(8):1574-1580. PubMed ID: 32173213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing changes in medication-taking and driving behavior after warnings about prescription medications that prohibit driving: an online survey. Fukuda Y; Saito M BMC Public Health; 2022 May; 22(1):1020. PubMed ID: 35596168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer perceptions of medication warnings about driving: a comparison of French and Australian labels. Smyth T; Sheehan M; Siskind V; Mercier-Guyon C; Mallaret M Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 23859486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study comparing the effectiveness of three warning labels on the package of driving-impairing medicines. Emich B; van Dijk L; Monteiro SP; de Gier JJ Int J Clin Pharm; 2014 Dec; 36(6):1152-9. PubMed ID: 25204257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized controlled trial evaluating pictogram augmentation of HIV medication information. Wilby K; Marra CA; da Silva JH; Grubisic M; Harvard S; Lynd LD Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Nov; 45(11):1378-83. PubMed ID: 22028420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Many Words Does a Picture Really Tell? Cross-sectional Descriptive Study of Pictogram Evaluation by Youth. Korenevsky A; Vaillancourt R; Pouliot A; Revol M; Steed E; Besançon L; Wahrendorf MS; Patel JR Can J Hosp Pharm; 2013 Jul; 66(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 23950605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Driving under the influence of drugs: Perceptions and attitudes of New Zealand drivers. Malhotra N; Starkey NJ; Charlton SG Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():44-52. PubMed ID: 28554064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and evaluation of pictograms on medication labels for patients with limited literacy skills in a culturally diverse multiethnic population. Kheir N; Awaisu A; Radoui A; El Badawi A; Jean L; Dowse R Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(5):720-30. PubMed ID: 24355379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Pictograms on Medication Packages Cause People to Consult Package Inserts Less Often? If so, With What Consequences? Reijnen E; Laasner Vogt L; Kühne SJ; Fiechter JP Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37622836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Police documentation of drug use in injured drivers: Implications for monitoring and preventing drug-impaired driving. Brubacher JR; Chan H; Erdelyi S; Asbridge M; Mann RE; Purssell RA; Solomon R Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():200-206. PubMed ID: 29482896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adherence to multiple, prescribed medications in diabetic kidney disease: A qualitative study of consumers' and health professionals' perspectives. Williams AF; Manias E; Walker R Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Dec; 45(12):1742-56. PubMed ID: 18701103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study. Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk and safety perception on urban and rural roads: Effects of environmental features, driver age and risk sensitivity. Cox JA; Beanland V; Filtness AJ Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Oct; 18(7):703-710. PubMed ID: 28436735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Crash risk perception of sleepy driving and its comparisons with drink driving and speeding: Which behavior is perceived as the riskiest? Watling CN; Armstrong KA; Smith SS; Obst PL Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 May; 17(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 26508332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmaceutical pictograms: a model for development and testing for comprehension and utility. Montagne M Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(5):609-20. PubMed ID: 23680485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Patient-Centered Prescription Drug Label to Promote Appropriate Medication Use and Adherence. Wolf MS; Davis TC; Curtis LM; Bailey SC; Knox JP; Bergeron A; Abbet M; Shrank WH; Parker RM; Wood AJ J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 27542666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]