219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31770168)
1. Frontal Crash Injury Metrics Are Below Mandated Limits for a Spica Casted Child Dummy in Currently Available Restraints.
Collins AC; Caskey S; Peck JB; Walter N; Atkinson TS; Atkinson PJ
J Pediatr Orthop; 2020; 40(5):e394-e400. PubMed ID: 31770168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safe transport of spica casted infants: Reducing the risk of traumatic injury in side impact collisions.
Collins AC; Adams N; Ostrander JD; Atkinson P; Atkinson TS
Am J Surg; 2022 Jan; 223(1):164-169. PubMed ID: 34538481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Injury metrics are altered in spica-casted versus non-casted child ATDs in side-impact collisions with door intrusion.
Mead M; Caskey S; Walter N; Atkinson P; Atkinson T; Collins AC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(6):341-346. PubMed ID: 32401560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Casting technique and restraint choice influence child safety during transport of body casted children subjected to a simulated frontal MVA.
Zielinski J; Oliver G; Sybesma J; Walter N; Atkinson P
J Trauma; 2009 Jun; 66(6):1653-65. PubMed ID: 19509628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crash Performance of Rear-facing Restraints With a Fracture Type Spica Casted 1-Year-Old Dummy.
Collins A; McKean L; Ostrander J; Nagarajan S; Atkinson P; Atkinson T
J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 Jan; 42(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 34889831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head excursion in frontal impacts is lower in high back booster seats than in forward facing child seats with internal harnesses designed for children up to 8 years of age.
Bilston LE; Mills E; Kent N; Brown J; Whyte T
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(5):244-249. PubMed ID: 35333678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic frontal crash performance of old and used child restraint systems.
Whyte T; Kent N; Griffiths M; Bilston LE; Brown J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(7):570-575. PubMed ID: 34432557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pretensioner loading to rear-seat occupants during static and dynamic testing.
Bohman K; Fredriksson R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S111-8. PubMed ID: 25307375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responses of the Q6/Q6s ATD Positioned in Booster Seats in the Far-Side Seat Location of Side Impact Passenger Car and Sled Tests.
Tylko S; Bohman K; Bussières A
Stapp Car Crash J; 2015 Nov; 59():313-35. PubMed ID: 26660749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head impact contact points for restrained child occupants.
Arbogast KB; Wozniak S; Locey CM; Maltese MR; Zonfrillo MR
Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 22458796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frontal and oblique crash tests of HIII 6-year-old child ATD using real-world, observed child passenger postures.
Bohman K; Arbogast KB; Loeb H; Charlton JL; Koppel S; Cross SL
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S125-S130. PubMed ID: 29584494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of postural support padding modifications to child restraints for children with disability on crash protection.
Cook L; Brown J; Kent N; Whyte T; Bilston LE
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):741-749. PubMed ID: 38619499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Child occupant safety in unconventional seating for vehicles with automated driving systems.
Hu J; Boyle K; Orton NR; Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107223. PubMed ID: 37480661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-chest clips in child restraints: A crash testing study.
Bilston LE; Kent N; Brown J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):720-725. PubMed ID: 31433676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
