125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31770467)
1. Continuous vs stepwise anal acoustic reflectometry: An improved technique for physiological measurement of anal sphincter function?
Heywood NA; Nicholson JE; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Klarskov N; Telford KJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jan; 39(1):447-454. PubMed ID: 31770467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Placement of a fine-bore rectal balloon catheter in the anal canal does not affect anal sphincter pressures: improving our understanding of physiological function with anal acoustic reflectometry.
Heywood NA; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Klarskov N; Telford KJ
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1626-1631. PubMed ID: 32770704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel method for measurement of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex using anal acoustic reflectometry.
Heywood NA; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Klarskov N; Telford KJ
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1632-1641. PubMed ID: 32367609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of anal acoustic reflectometry and anal manometry in the assessment of faecal incontinence.
Hornung BR; Mitchell PJ; Carlson GL; Klarskov N; Lose G; Kiff ES
Br J Surg; 2012 Dec; 99(12):1718-24. PubMed ID: 23132420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anal acoustic reflectometry: a new reproducible technique providing physiological assessment of anal sphincter function.
Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Telford KJ; Hosker GL; Lose G; Kiff ES
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Sep; 54(9):1122-8. PubMed ID: 21825892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physiological study of the anorectal reflex in patients with functional anorectal and defecation disorders.
Thiruppathy K; Mason J; Akbari K; Raeburn A; Emmanuel A
J Dig Dis; 2017 Apr; 18(4):222-228. PubMed ID: 28261913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Viscoelastic assessment of anal canal function using acoustic reflectometry: a clinically useful technique.
Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Telford KJ; Hosker GL; Lose G; Kiff ES
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Feb; 55(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 22228166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anal vector volume analysis: an effective tool in the management of pelvic floor disorders.
Grande M; Cadeddu F; Sileri P; Ciano P; Attinà GM; Selvaggio I; Milito G
Tech Coloproctol; 2011 Mar; 15(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21153854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Anal Acoustic Reflectometry in the Evaluation of Men With Passive Fecal Leakage.
Hornung BR; Telford KJ; Carlson GL; Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Kiff ES
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 May; 60(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 28383452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pubovisceral muscle and anal sphincter defects in women with fecal or urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery.
Murad-Regadas SM; Regadas FSP; Filho FSPR; Borges LB; da Silva Vilarinho A; Veras LB; Regadas CM; Regadas MM
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Feb; 23(2):117-128. PubMed ID: 30478651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic anal manometry: physiological variations and pathophysiological findings in fecal incontinence.
Rasmussen OO; Sørensen M; Tetzschner T; Christiansen J
Gastroenterology; 1992 Jul; 103(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 1612318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anal sensitivity test: what does it measure and do we need it? Cause or derivative of anorectal complaints.
Felt-Bersma RJ; Poen AC; Cuesta MA; Meuwissen SG
Dis Colon Rectum; 1997 Jul; 40(7):811-6. PubMed ID: 9221858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodologic Validation of a Faster Pelvic Floor Test: Two Randomized Studies in Anal Acoustic Reflectometry.
Nicholson JE; Klarskov N; Heywood NA; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Telford KJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 May; 62(5):623-630. PubMed ID: 30540659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anal acoustic reflectometry: a new technique for assessing anal sphincter function.
Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Hosker G; Lose G; Kiff ES
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Jul; 12(7):692-7. PubMed ID: 20070337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Water-perfused manometry vs three-dimensional high-resolution manometry: a comparative study on a large patient population with anorectal disorders.
Vitton V; Ben Hadj Amor W; Baumstarck K; Grimaud JC; Bouvier M
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Dec; 15(12):e726-31. PubMed ID: 24034300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anal acoustic reflectometry predicts the outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation for faecal incontinence.
Hornung BR; Carlson GL; Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Lose G; Telford KJ; Kiff ES
Br J Surg; 2014 Sep; 101(10):1310-6. PubMed ID: 25043271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional anal canal length measurement using high-resolution anorectal manometry to investigate anal sphincter dysfunction in patients with fecal incontinence or constipation.
Vollebregt PF; Rasijeff AMP; Pares D; Grossi U; Carrington EV; Knowles CH; Scott SM
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2019 Mar; 31(3):e13532. PubMed ID: 30637863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new method of assessing anal sphincter integrity using inverted vectormanometry.
Kaur G; Gardiner A; Duthie GS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Aug; 49(8):1160-6. PubMed ID: 16708160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence.
Bharucha AE; Fletcher JG; Harper CM; Hough D; Daube JR; Stevens C; Seide B; Riederer SJ; Zinsmeister AR
Gut; 2005 Apr; 54(4):546-55. PubMed ID: 15753542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anorectal pressure gradient and rectal compliance in fecal incontinence.
Rasmussen OO; Rønholt C; Alstrup N; Christiansen J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 1998; 13(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 9810518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
